|Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979|
Clinical Supervision: Models, Role, Legal & Ethical, & Transference
In the last section we discussed how Jamie, a 21-year-old pregnant woman, was resistant to accept the dangers of her situation after she heard the basic domestic violence information. This, as you know, may not be unusual for a client who has recently been battered.
However, the point of this section is not to deal with Jamie’s resistance, but to provide three steps that your supervisee may use when dealing with his or her own mistake of arrogance. Are you currently working with a supervisee with an arrogance countertransference reaction? What do you feel would be appropriate for you to discuss related to working through past conflicts?
Have you found, like I, that it is hard to avoid the mistake of arrogance when dealing with a client like Jamie? There are three main Traps of Arrogance that I find I must work to avoid when treating battered clients.
3 Main Traps of Arrogance Your Supervisee May Exhibit
Trap #1: Imposing My Own Reality and Values
Remember Jamie from the previous section? Here is a mistake I made. By subconsciously believing leaving was the best course of action for Jamie, I made the mistake of paying little attention to how Jamie defined her reality. What were Jamie’s values? What did Jamie want for herself and for her unborn child? In retrospect, Jamie provided clues about her reality throughout the course of our session.
Exercise for the Supervisee
Moreover, in retrospect, I do not believe that Jamie viewed herself as a battered woman, yet this is how I was treating her. I believe that Jamie was in the "Precontemplation Stage of Change". By this, I mean she was likely in denial and discounted the severity of her abuse in an effort to believe the good side of Paul. Do you agree that by not considering Jamie’s construct of reality and stage of change, I had devised a contact with Jamie that was actually harmful?
Trap #2: Assuming the Dominant Role
Trap #3: Disempowering a Battered Client
1. Inequity between myself and Jamie. Jamie was vulnerable, and it was unlikely she would ever challenge the contract I had created. This brings up a paradox to consider. As you know, while wanting to facilitate empowerment, a supervisee may at the same time devise goals and objectives that may possibly disagree with the battered woman's feelings of comfort. I often remind myself to be aware that objectives will have to be modified based on a client's stage of change. Realizing Jamie’s vulnerability could have helped in my sessions with Jamie.
2. Discounting Jamie feelings about Paul. I feel I also disempowered Jamie by discounting her feelings about Paul. As you know, men who batter often discount their partner's feelings by saying women are "crazy" or "stupid" for feeling a certain way or for expressing a certain opinion. While I never described Jamie as "stupid" or "crazy", my behavior did convey a negative attitude about her life, behaviors, and attitudes. I did not encourage her to talk about Paul's good side, but instead I focused on the escalation of his violence. Do you agree that by not encouraging Jamie to talk about the good things, to a certain extent, I failed to show Jamie the compassion she needed?
Telling Her Story
3 Ways Jamie Defined Reality
In this section I have discussed three "Traps of Arrogance" to avoid when working with victims of domestic violence. These three traps are: Imposing my own Reality and Values, Assuming the Dominant Role, and Disempowering. Does your supervisee struggle to avoid these traps of arrogance when working with a battered client? If this struggle could be at a subconscious level, would bringing it to your supervisee’s conscious awareness decrease burnout?
Others who bought this Course