Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

Unintended Victims: Diagnosis & Treatment of Children of Domestic Violence
2 CEUs Unintended Victims: Diagnosis & Treatment of Children of Domestic Violence

Section 6
The Meaning of Meaning:
From Hurt to Hate

Question 6 | CEU Answer Booklet | Table of Contents | Domestic Violence CEU Courses
Counselor CEUs, Psychologist CEs, Social Worker CEUs, MFT CEUs


Although we seem to respond almost instantaneously to assaults, whether physical or psychological, we do not always experience anger. Whether we do so depends on the context of the injury and the explanation for it. A young child subjected to an injection by the family doctor will fight and scream to protect herself from an inexplicable infliction of pain. An adult receiving such an injection, and experiencing the same kind of pain, may have some anxiety but will not typically respond with anger.

The obvious difference between the child’s and the adult’s reactions lies in the meaning of the event. For the child, there is no comprehensible explanation for having to undergo the frightening and painful procedure except that the doctor is overpowering and cruel. Moreover, her typically benevolent parents have betrayed her by facilitating the assault. For the adult, the procedure, although painful and possibly anxiety-producing, is warranted and acceptable. Responding with anger would be illogical, because he is voluntarily submitting to a beneficial procedure. Unlike the child, he has learned to discriminate between malevolent and benevolent injuries, between acceptable and unacceptable infliction of pain. He has expanded his construct of pain to include experiences that, while painful, are ultimately positive.

This example shows the importance of meanings, attributions, and explanations in determining how we respond to our experiences. When somebody hurts us, our natural reaction is to feel anxious and try to escape, or to feel angry and try to fight back. If the threat is overwhelming, we are disposed to get out of the situation. Whether or not we become angry depends on whether we judge that we have been wronged or victimized: we are likely to become angry if we believe the other person was unjustified. If we attribute a benevolent motivation to the act, we do not generally become angry. Unless we are specifically “primed” to explain assaults as benign, however, our immediate reaction is to regard unpleasant actions as intentional and malevolent and to prepare to punish the offender or to escape.

Picture the following scene: I am waiting at a bus stop. A bus comes by and doesn’t stop. First I feel distress at being inconvenienced, then a sense of helplessness as the bus speeds by without even slowing down. I think, “He (the driver) deliberately ignored me,” and feel angry. But then I notice that the bus is full, and my anger subsides. The key to my angry reaction was my interpretation that the driver arbitrarily chose to ignore me. The actual inconvenience is minor compared with the presumed offensive behavior. Once I reframe the situation, the “offense” fades away and I regard the incident as simply an inconvenience. I can then turn my attention to ascertaining when the next bus is due or considering other ways of getting to my destination.

Delays and frustrations do not in themselves necessarily produce anger. The crucial element is the explanation of the other person’s action, and whether that explanation makes the other person’s behavior acceptable to us. If it does not, we become angry and want to punish the offender. For the most part we regard behavior that offends us as intentional rather than accidental, as malicious rather than benign. Inconveniences and frustrations come and go, but the sense of being wronged persists.

An illustrative clinical example of how anger is aroused comes from the files in our clinic. Analyses of clinical cases are particularly illuminating: since the reactions tend to be magnified, they are more clearly delineated and understood.

Louise, a personnel supervisor in a large employment agency, found that she was almost continually angry at her subordinates or superiors, as well as at family and friends. A few of her angry reactions demonstrate the mecha­nisms involved in the triggering and the expression of her hostile response. On one occasion, her boss corrected a memorandum that she had prepared. Louise had these automatic thoughts following her boss’s “criticisms”: “Uh­oh, I’ve made a mistake.” Then: “He really thinks I did a bad job. . . . I messed it up this time.” Her self-esteem was damaged, and she felt bad. Louise’s reactions demonstrate the typical dichotomous thinking triggered by threats to the self-esteem. If feedback is not all positive, it becomes totally negative: a mistake becomes a really bad job, a criticism becomes total rejec­tion.

Later, as she mulled over the event, she became increasingly angry and had a different set of automatic thoughts: “He had no right to treat me that way after all I’ve done for him. . . . He’s unfair. He never shows appreciation for my work. All he does is criticize. . . . I hate him.” By shifting the expla­nation for her hurt to her boss’s “unfairness,” she was able to salve the hurt to her self-esteem. In essence, her focus shifted from, “He disapproves of me; he considers me inadequate,” to, “He was wrong to have criticized me.” Assigning responsibility to another person for unjustly “causing” an unpleasant feeling is a prelude to feeling angry. The persistence of a sense of threat and the fixed image of a malicious person leads to at least a temporary feeling of hate. It is much easier to sustain anger or aggression when we drift from specific actions (he criticized this memo in two places) to overgeneralizations (he always criticizes me) or labels (he’s unfair). The drift is often outside aware­ness; people may hold grudges about matters they no longer recall.
- Beck, Aaron T., Prisioners of Hate, HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.: New York, 1999.
The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.

=================================

Personal Reflection Exercise #3
The preceding section contained information about the meaning of anger. Write three case study examples regarding how you might use the content of this section in your practice.

QUESTION 6
Since delays and frustrations do not in themselves necessarily produce anger, what is the crucial element in producing anger?
Record the letter of the correct answer the CEU Answer Booklet.

 
Others who bought this Domestic Violence Course
also bought…

Scroll DownScroll UpCourse Listing Bottom Cap

CEU Answer Booklet for this course | Domestic Violence CEU Courses
Forward to Section 7
Back to Section 5
Table of Contents
Top

The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.
Human Trafficking In North Carolina - August 11, 2016
North Carolina is among the top 10 states with the highest number of reported human trafficking cases, according to the National Human Trafficking Resource Center. Experts say the number of major interstates that cross through the state, the large agricultural population, and the state’s strategic location along the East Coast contribute to the issue. Host Frank Stasio talks with legal experts, victim services advocates, and a law enforcement officer about human trafficking in the state. Victim-services advocates Karen Arias of Western North Carolina Human Trafficking Rapid Response Team and Mamie Adams, coordinator of Working to End Sex Trafficking in North Carolina, discuss the experiences and challenges faced by trafficking survivors in the state. Major Richard Hoffman of the Raleigh Police Department talks about the role of law enforcement in investigating and stopping human trafficking, and his work on trafficking cases. And Caitlin Ryland from Legal Aid of North Carolina talks
‘The State Of Things’ Producer Picks: A Look Back At 2015 With Anita Rao - December 22, 2015
The year is coming to an end, and “The State of Things” staff is taking a moment to reflect on some of the year’s most memorable conversations. Producer Anita Rao’s favorite segments include a conversation commemorating Yusor Abu-Salha, one of the three Muslim students shot and killed in Chapel Hill in February. Rao also chose a piece that explores body image, fat shaming, and the social history of women’s bodies. She also picked a segment that shares the stories of three Latina women who work as house cleaners in Durham, and one that looks at how domestic violence impacted one couple’s life and relationship. She ends the hour talking about a conversation with Avett Brothers’ Cellist Joe Kwon. Host Frank Stasio talks with Producer Anita Rao about her favorite conversations of the year.
Marine Turned Entrepreneur Uses Technology To Reduce Violence - November 30, 2015
This is a rebroadcast of a program that aired earlier this year. CJ Scarlet is an entrepreneur who believes that technology can curb violence. She founded the company 10 for Humanity that aims to use emerging technology to reduce acts of crime and violence by 10 percent in the next decade, starting with the Tiger Eye Sensor, a wearable personal security device that will record video footage and call the police when a wearer yells “help.” Scarlet’s personal and professional experiences have informed the design and implementation of this sensor. She survived multiple assaults in her adolescence and early adulthood and has worked with victims of crime and assault for two decades, as a victims advocate and as the director of victim’s issues at the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office. She is full of unexpected stories, ranging from her experience as a firefighter to her day-to-day life as a photojournalist for the Marine Corps. Host Frank Stasio talks to CJ Scarlet about her life, work
Greensboro Launches Family Justice Center For Victims Of Abuse - June 15, 2015
A Family Justice Center is opening today in downtown Greensboro and will offer a variety of services. The new building will provide several types of support for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and elder abuse. Those services include law enforcement, legal, medical and social assistance. Center Director Catherine Johnson said it is a benefit that the building is a one-stop spot for people dealing with these issues. "The fact that we can offer (these services) makes the citizen much more likely to engage in that process, because they feel like, 'Oh hey, wait—instead of me going to twenty different disciplines, those disciplines are all coming to me, and I just sit in the same office and respond,'" Johnson said. "It just makes that safety planning process much more effective." Guilford County had the state’s highest number of domestic-violence-related deaths in 2013. North Carolina also has family justice centers in Alamance County and Henderson County.
Life Inside The Courtroom, A More Honest Take - May 28, 2015
Allison Leotta was a federal sex-crimes prosecutor in Washington D.C. for more than a decade. Every day when she came home from work, she would think to herself, “I can’t believe what I saw today…someone should write about this.” She began writing in the mornings before work and at night when she got home. In 2011, Leotta left the Justice Department to write full-time. She has now written four novels about a prosecutor named Anna Curtis, and people often refer to Leotta as “the female John Grisham.” Host Frank Stasio talks to Allison Leotta about her latest novel “A Good Killing” (Simon&Schuster 2015) and how she turns her real-life courtroom experience into fictional drama. Leotta reads from her book at Barnes & Noble in Cary tonight at 7 p.m. Leotta grew up with the legal system in her blood. Her father worked as a federal prosecutor in Detroit, and she followed in his footsteps after attending Harvard Law School. Her husband was also a federal prosecutor in Baltimore. Though

OnlineCEUcredit.com Login


Forget your Password Reset it!