Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

Addictions: Treating the Family Struggling with Sobriety
10 CEUs Addictions: Treating the Family Struggling with Sobriety

Section 18
Psychoeducational Group for Children from Drug-Involved Families

CEUs Question 18 | CEU Answer Booklet | Table of Contents | Addictions CEU Courses
Social Worker CEU, Psychologist CE, Counselor CEU, & MFT CEU

Growing up in a home where adults use drugs poses significant risks to the psychosocial development of children (Dore, Kauffman, Nelson-Zlupko, & Granfort, 1996; Hayford, Epps, & Dahl-Regis, 1988; sexual violence Struggling with Sobriety  counselor CEUScherling, 1994). These risks have multiple sources. First and foremost are the risks to fetal development from drug exposure in utero, which may lead to low birthweight, physical deformities, mental retardation, and other problems (Behnke & Eyler, 1992; Finnegan & Kendall, 1992). Maternal drug use in pregnancy is often combined with poor nutrition and lack of prenatal care, compounding the risk of poor outcomes for these infants. Furthermore, children born to drug-involved parents may be inadequately nurtured physically and emotionally during their formative years (Hawley, Halle, Drasin, & Thomas, 1995; Williams-Petersen et al., 1994). Child welfare workers commonly receive reports of infants and small children left alone for hours or even days while drug-using parents seek their next high. Addicted parents may forget to feed their children, bathe them, or comb their hair. Children as young as three or four years old may function as caregivers for parents or younger siblings.

Children in drug-involved families are often exposed to, and themselves experience, physical and sexual violence and other forms of trauma (Jaudes, Ekwo, & Van Voorhis, 1995; Kelleher, Chaffin, Hollenberg, & Fischer, 1994). It is estimated that 60 percent to 80 percent of children currently entering the foster care system do so because of abuse or neglect associated with familial substance abuse (Barth, Courtney, Berrick, & Albert, 1994; Jaudes et al., 1995). Parents abusing stimulants such as crack cocaine are more prone to agitation and are easily irritated by a child's normal chatter and play. They may lash out verbally or physically as a result. Violence among drug-using adults is common and frequently observed by young children. Many such children have also witnessed their addicted mothers prostituting for drug money or have been prostituted themselves by parents desperate for their next hit.

Not all children living in drug-involved families suffer negative consequences, particularly those who experience compensatory caregiving. However, by the time they reach school age many of these children demonstrate cognitive delays (van Baar, 1990), attenuated attention spans, difficulties in concentration (Bauman & Dougherty, 1983), and emotional and behavioral problems (Hawley et al., 1995; Johnson, Bonney, & Brown, 1990-91), all of which make classroom functioning difficult and threaten school failure. Like their parents, they often have few internalized behavior controls and, as a result, disrupt the classroom. They may become easily frustrated and explosive, lack rudimentary social skills, and be physically aggressive or, alternatively, they may withdraw from others. Negative self-evaluation and low self-worth may result from rejection by teachers and classmates.

Despite widespread recognition of the risks that parental drug use poses to children, few resources are available to help such children. Most research and available treatments target chemically dependent adults to the exclusion of their children. Even in programs specifically designed for chemically dependent women and their children, programming to address the effects of parental drug use on children is frequently lacking. Our experience suggests that the treatment of children of drug-involved parents depends entirely on their parents' involvement in treatment. Once a parent leaves treatment, his or her child's opportunity for services ends. Erratic attendance, characteristic of adult substance abusers, translates into erratic attendance of their children in treatment as well. In short, we observed scarce, sporadic services for children from drug-involved families, a population at highest risk.

To address this need, we developed and tested a group intervention that could be readily applied in elementary schools and other community agencies where children's access to services is not dependent on parental attendance in drug treatment. Our research suggested that this intervention should be both therapeutic and preventive in nature, ameliorating already-existing problems as well as preventing further difficulties from developing in the future. The intervention would need to address the affective domain and the psychosocial elements such as attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral responses to parental drug use.

A review of the existing literature on interventions with latency-aged drug-exposed children, our target population, found that most well-developed, empirically validated interventions were either solely preventive in focus or if therapeutic in intent, were geared toward children from alcoholic families. In addition, effective prevention programs seldom targeted the early school-age population that we hoped to reach. They did, however, provide support for incorporating training in age-appropriate personal and social skills to enable children to cope with a broad range of situations likely to arise in drug-using environments. These include general problem-solving skills, skills for increasing self-control and self-esteem, strategies for managing anger and anxiety through alternative coping responses and relaxation techniques, and interpersonal-relations skills (Botvin & Botvin, 1992). Outcome studies indicate that structured, time-limited psychoeducational groups are effective in addressing related psychosocial problems of early school-age children, such as aggression (Eargle, Guerra, & Tolan, 1994), poor social skills (MacLennan, 1994), disruptive behavior in the classroom (Bilides, 1992), and sexual abuse (Hack, Osachuk, & DeLuca, 1994).

Also important to our concerns, none of the intervention models described in the literature focused specifically on children from economically depressed inner-city neighborhoods, the location of our study. This raised questions about the appropriateness of existing models for such children, as well as the possibility of differing treatment needs of children from families involved in illicit drug use where few of any compensatory community resources are available.

Intervention Design
Because we could find no empirically validated school-based interventions aimed specifically at latency-aged children from drug-abusing families, we used a developmental research model for designing and evaluating our intervention. This model prescribes a structured approach to developing innovative interventions in the human services (Thomas & Rothman, 1994), in which significant investment is made in predevelopment planning, including problem analysis and knowledge acquisition and synthesis (Rothman, 1989). The design and development (testing) stages that follow are recursive; that is, each informs the other until the intervention is refined and rigorously evaluated. Recently this model has been applied specifically to designing and implementing preventive interventions such as we aimed to developed (Dumka, Roosa, Michaels, & Suh, 1995).

The Intervention Model
In our revised intervention, each of the eight group sessions, an hour and a half in length, follows the same structured format. Children are greeted personally by the group leaders at the door as they enter the room and take their seats around a table. Each session begins with a review of the "group rules," which clearly convey expectations of behavior and interpersonal conduct during the session. The group rules are printed on a poster that everyone can see as they recite them together.

The second activity in every session is recitation of the "Four Cs": You didn't cause it; you can't control it; you can't cure it; you can be okay. The Four Cs, adapted from the literature on families of alcoholics, are intended to help ameliorate the pervasive guilt that children from substance-abusing families have been found to carry because of their interpretation of parental substance use as somehow their fault. The Four Cs also address children's "magical thinking" regarding cause and cure; children often believe if they were only better behaved or took better care of their parents, the parents would not abuse drugs. The final message the Four Cs is designed to convey is that there are things children can do in situations where familial drug abuse is occurring to protect and care for themselves.

Two other activities structured into the beginning of every group session are the "Name Game" and "Best and Worst." The purpose of the Name Game is to help children begin to see themselves as worthy individuals with positive attributes. Best and Worst enables children to learn to share their experiences with others and to give and receive support from peers. These activities are designed to address the negative self-concepts and social isolation often observed in children from substance-abusing families.

Every group session ends with two activities also designed to enhance peer involvement and individual affirmation. One is a closing circle with a special handshake and goodbye statement recited in unison; the other requires the children to leave the room after speaking personal goodbyes to each of the group leaders. The group leaders use this opportunity to verbally reinforce each participant's positive behavior during the session.

In addition to repetition of the opening and closing activities, there are two brief activities in each session designed to highlight and address psychosocial issues of concern. For example, in the second group session, leaders present a large chart with pictures of faces expressing a variety of feelings. Group members each identify a feeling from the chart that they have experienced and share it with the group. The purpose of the exercise is to help children recognize a range of different feelings, put names to those feelings, and gain skill in verbalizing feelings rather than acting them out. This sedentary exercise is followed by a more active one that reinforces the learning: "Simon Says," using expression of the feelings they have just identified rather than touching parts of the body as in the usual "Simon Says."

Other activities structured into group sessions include reading a story about a boy whose big sister is using drugs and discussing it; writing a letter to the boy in this story, giving him suggestions of things he could do when he felt upset or scared about his sister's drug involvement; taking a large sheet of paper, folded in half, and drawing on one side of the page a person using drugs and on the other side of the page the same person not using drugs.

Each group activity is accompanied by a discussion of the main ideas or concepts. It is in these discussions that the worries and fears of participants come to the fore. Common themes that emerged in our groups included: disappointment when mom or dad did not keep promises; hurt when a parent said mean things when they were high; fears over what a parent would do when high; fear because a substance-abusing parent was not aware that someone else was touching them inappropriately; shame that their family was not a "normal" one; appreciation for the good things a parent would do for them when sober; and deep love for a parent despite drug use. Children whose parents were in recovery also identified powerful feelings, including anger that mom or dad is "so busy with recovery they don't have time for me," and unresolved pain over things that happened before a parent got sober. With assistance from the group leaders, participants helped each other express grief over these situations, validated one another's needs for emotional support, and brainstormed strategies for coping.
- Dore, Martha, Nelson-Zlupko, Lani, & Eda Kaufmann, ‘Friends in Need’: Designing and Implementing a Psychoeducational Group for School Children from Drug-Involved Families, Social Work, Mar 1999, Vol. 44, Issue 2.

Personal Reflection Exercise #4
The preceding section contained information about psychoeducational groups for children from drug-involved families.  Write three case study examples regarding how you might use the content of this section in your practice.

Online Continuing Education QUESTION 18
Not all children living in drug-involved families suffer negative consequences such as abuse and neglect, particularly those who experience compensatory caregiving. However, what do these children often experience by the time they reach school age? Record the letter of the correct answer the CEU Answer Booklet.

 

CEU Answer Booklet for this course | Addictions CEU Courses
Forward to Section 19
Back to Section 17
Table of Contents
Top

CEU Continuing Education for
Social Work CEU, Psychology CEU, Counselor CEU, MFT CEU

Get Social Worker CEUs, Psychology CEUs, Marriage and Family Therapist CEUS, Counselor CEUS, or Addiction Counselor CEUs for license renewal. OnlineCECredit.com offers 150+ easy, fast, affordable CE courses to earn your Continuing Education Credit. We are an approved provider of CE courses by APA, ASWB, NBCC, NAADAC, and various State Licensing Boards.

Our objective is to provide you… the Social Worker, Psychologist, Marriage and Family Therapist, Counselor, or Addiction Counselor with continuing education courses that contain practical, how-to interventions. Do these CE courses meet the requirements of your state licensing board? Select your state and profession above to view your Licensing Board's continuing education requirements.


OnlineCEUcredit.com Login


Forget your Password Reset it!