Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

Separation Counseling: Brief Interventions for Divorcing Couples
10 CEUs Separation Counseling: Brief Interventions for Divorcing Couples

Section 11 (Web #25)
Couples at War

Question 25 | Test | Table of Contents | Couples CEU Courses
Counselor CEUs, Psychologist CEs, Social Worker CEUs, MFT CEUs

Managing warring couples is not for the faint-hearted, says Nick Duffell. When the client is a relationship, therapists need to harness the energy that is flying around the room and be able to work creatively with it

I like working with couples. I like the immediacy, I like the intensity and I like the fact that, given the right amount of skill, willingness and grace, you can help change things for the benefit of a whole family, sometimes in very few sessions. But I know that not all counsellors and therapists feel comfortable seeing couples. I still remember the feelings of total inadequacy I had when, several years ago, armed with my newlywon counselling diploma, I started at a high-street counselling centre in a suburban town and faced my first couple. (Unknown to me, most requests for therapy at the clinic were for couple counselling.) Although I had been well trained to take on a person's internal conflict or their lack of meaning in life, I was sorely tested when faced with a real live couple's heated conflict, in what I had hoped would be an ambience of reason in my consulting room.

Another illusion shattered! I had to learn on my feet — and fast. I don't know how I achieved it, but I still remember my first success with a couple, when one day, as I was leaving work, a man in a white van hooted at me in the traffic and said, 'You saved my marriage, mate!' Of course I didn't, but I had helped him and his wife not to feel utter failures, and I gave them some context for why things were going wrong between them. I had encouraged them to begin to think about what they were trying to achieve as men and women that was similar or different from their parents, and I gave them some basic tools for handling their disagreements. They made the commitment to save their marriage, and together we made the first steps a reality. The fact that I myself was undergoing a painful divorce helped me to have empathy, but I also felt a bit of a fraud sitting on this side of the couch. Eventually, that shame led me to seriously question what being a couple really entailed, to do lots of reading and attending workshops, and finally to get some more relevant training. I became a couple therapist.

A Powerful Entity
So what are the main differences in working with couples rather than individuals? These are some of them:

  • the amount of bitterness and conflict presented
  • the presence of real-time 'problems' rather than a wish to reflect
  • a tendency towards triangulation
  • numerous traps where the counsellor gets caught by one of the partners
  • the looming consequence of a relationship breaking up rather than transforming.

But perhaps the outstanding difference, and the one that causes many therapists to avoid couple work, is very simply this: that a couple is such a powerful entity. Generally, couples present for counselling full of disappointment, wracked with emotions, plagued by acting out, torn apart by conflict, or utterly stuck. It can be quite a handful to have that in your nice peaceful therapy room.

However, as in many things, the nature of the problem contains the seeds of its own solution. The power of the couple means that couple-workers have to apply more powerful interventions than they may be used to in individual work. Some counsellors, particularly those from the person-centred end of the spectrum, struggle with this. Often it seems that they are being asked to be too penetrative, and — having developed a style that is mostly receptive — this goes against the grain. But consider this very strong statement from master family therapist Karl Whittaker: 'With couples, one is usually being the patient and one the therapist and every once in a while, they'll flip round and go the other way. I'll tell them, "This worked out fine during the first period of your marriage, but now you've got to an impasse, you're locked, just the way a therapist and his patient often get. And I'm taking over. You're just a couple of amateurs and you've failed.'"

A Normalising Intervention
Outrageous as such an intervention may seem at first, on closer scrutiny it reveals itself to be deeply kind and healing. By means of it, Whittaker employs the first powerful tool of couplework — normalising. He makes it known that he sees the task ahead. He normalises the couple's apparent failure at the difficult task of relationship, normalises that there is usually an imbalance, a distancer-pursuer dynamic, where one seems to be saddled with the 'impossible other' and one takes the role of analysing the other.

He normalises their good intentions for conflict and maintains that couples need and deserve help in this process. He normalises that, when they were first in love, the powerful forces of attraction meant that they were being their best and did not notice the human faults of the other, nor what they had projected onto their partner. It is a deeply human but very powerful intervention.

It is precisely because of the power that couples bring that the coupleworker has the potential to harness it and work with it creatively. This means in fact that couplework can actually go much deeper than individual work. Moreover, since relationships are generally replete with disowned and projected elements from each partner, the therapist — being just outside the system — is well placed to see, while the protagonists, presenting in their relationship rather than their individual selves, find it much harder to hide. Following these leads, the couple worker can encourage relevant and useful information to emerge at the right time to explain previously baffling disappointments, expectations and impasses. So couple work can also go much faster than individual work.

In his recently published autobiography, ex-US president Bill Clinton claims to have repaired his marriage, to have discovered the root conditions that motivated his catastrophic acting-out, and to have put his life on an entirely new footing — simply through undergoing several months of couple therapy.
- Duffell, Nick, CPJ: Counselling & Psychotherapy Journal, 14745372, Nov2004, Vol. 15, Issue 9

Evidence-Based Counseling Interventions with Chidren of Divorce:
Implications for Elementary School Counselors

- Connolly, M. E. and Green, E. J. Evidence-Based Counseling Interventions with Chidren of Divorce: Implications for Elementary School Counselors.

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
O'Hara, K. L., Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Tein, J.-Y., & Rhodes, C. A. (2019). Parenting time, parenting quality, interparental conflict, and mental health problems of children in high-conflict divorce. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(6), 690–703. 

Øverup, C. S., Ciprić, A., Gad Kjeld, S., Strizzi, J. M., Sander, S., Lange, T., & Hald, G. M. (2020). Cooperation after divorce: A randomized controlled trial of an online divorce intervention on hostility. Psychology of Violence.Advance online publication. 

van Scheppingen, M. A., & Leopold, T. (2020). Trajectories of life satisfaction before, upon, and after divorce: Evidence from a new matching approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1444–1458.

What does Whittaker define as the "first, powerful tool of couplework?" To select and enter your answer, go to the Test.

Others who bought this Couples Course
also bought…

Scroll DownScroll UpCourse Listing Bottom Cap

Test for this course | Couples CEU Courses
Forward to Section 26
Back to Section 24
Table of Contents

OnlineCEUcredit.com Login

Forget your Password Reset it!