Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

Immigrant & Refugee, Cultural Diversity & Ethical Boundaries: Freedom from Stereotypes
3 CEUs Cultural Diversity & Ethical Boundaries: Freedom from Stereotypes

Section 9
Multiculturalism and Mental Health Professional Ethics

Question 9 | Ethics CEUs Answer Booklet | Table of Contents
Social Worker CEU, Psychologist CE, Counselor CEU, MFT CEU

Ethics - Defining Multiculturalism
It important to note that the terms "diversity," "cultural diversity," and "multiculturalism" tend to be used interchangeably and without clear distinction. For example, workshops promote training on cultural diversity,social worker Cultural Ethics Boundaries psychology continuing ed not the more precise term "multiculturalism" which suggests competence. For purposes of this analysis, the term "multiculturalism" is used as the more precise way of representing the social worker's competence with cultural diversity.

The literature presents various definitions of multiculturalism (Jenkins, 1988). At one level, it refers to the promotion of minority intellectual contributions as a counter to the dominant, majority culture; at another, it is cross-cultural interaction between people. Some people tend to see multiculturalism as an expression of empowerment, since it promotes better understanding and responsiveness to minorities and the disenfranchised (Faulkner, Roberts-DeGennaro, & Weil, 1994; Lewis & Ford, 1990; Pinderhughes, 1997; Weinrach & Thomas, 1996). These broad definitions do not yield clear content or direction for competence assessments. Some authors, however, contend that cultural knowledge and skills development are essential components of counselor training (Green, 1995; Parker, 1988). This article raises the question as to whether multiculturalism is an ethical principle that should guide and inform all professional conduct, or whether it is a specific content area that one can "know" or possess as a measurable skill.

Judging by contemporary graduate course syllabi, Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) educational policy and accreditation standards, the NASW Code of Ethics, and by the content outlines of social work licensure examinations, multiculturalism appears to be a domain of specific content knowledge rather than a posture or stance taken with clients. If it is a topic area that can be mastered, then it follows that a social worker should be able to demonstrate competence in it. To represent it as a definable content area is to equate it with other social work content areas such as family systems theories, domestic violence, or the clinical features of drug addiction, which can be taught, understood, tested, and practiced by the competent social worker.

The 1999 NASW Code of Ethics defines multiculturalism as actual knowledge content, not as a practice perspective or belief. It divides cultural competence into three elements, each of which is stated as content knowledge that can be attained:

1.5 Cultural Competence and Social Diversity
(a) Social workers should understand culture and its function in human behavior and society, recognizing the strengths that exist in all cultures.

(b) Social workers should have a knowledge base of their clients' cultures and be able to demonstrate competence in the provision of services that are sensitive to clients' cultures and to differences among people and cultural groups.

(c) Social workers should obtain education about and seek to understand the nature of social diversity and oppression with respect to race, ethnicity, national origin, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, political belief, religion, and mental or physical disability. (NASW, 1999, emphases added)

All three of these items predicate content areas and competencies that can be taught, learned, and assessed in competency testing of social workers. Section (b) is most definitive about the content knowledge that the social worker must attain. This standard is also reflected in the CSWE Policy Statement, sec. M6.6, that calls for master's programs to require content about population groups distinguished by race, ethnicity, culture, class, etc. (CSWE, 1994). Reamer (1998) reiterates the ethical importance of cultural knowledge particularly as a sensitivity to oppression, but he does not draw a clear distinction between a general awareness of cultural differences and specific knowledge of cultures.

It is questionable whether multiculturalism can be defined reliably across different practice settings and in different institutions. Given the range of applications and definitions of the concept, it is further questionable whether multicultural sensitivity has sufficiently distinct content for it to be testable in the way that other social work content areas are. This article suggests that multiculturalism is best framed not as a content area, but as an ethical principle that orients and directs all social work knowledge and practice. In other words, the representation of multiculturalism in social work ethics is best conceived of as a value that is diffused throughout all practice areas rather than an area of discrete knowledge.
The multicultural issue becomes more confused by the tendency of some proponents to apply multiculturalism in rigid and judgmental ways. The Stanford debates, for example, aired policies that deliberately excluded traditional Western literature in favor of a "counter canon" of contemporary and minority culture literature-substituting one rigid cultural view for another-all in the name of multiculturalism (Gould, 1995). In response to this rigidity, Gould (1995) proposed a concept of "transcultural" or cross cultural thinking that promoted openness and understanding rather than entrenched positions. Multiculturalism, which ostensibly is about tolerance and diversity of views and beliefs, can become a politically correct pledge of allegiance instead of a value message that promotes openness and tolerance (Hartman, 1991; Paglia, 1992). While Jackson (1995) announced that "multiculturalism is here to stay" there is still much to be learned about the concept and its application in social work ethics as a knowledge area.

Multiculturalism's lack of clarity is further exemplified by a recent article addressing specific approaches for intervention with clients whose cultural background differed from that of the social worker. The guidelines included, "Be willing to chat with the client to further develop trust and build rapport"; "Be clear about confidentiality--clarify what information has to be shared and which information the client wants to share with others"; and "Accept the client's comfort level in talking about feelings" (Tolliver, Pares-Avila, Montano-Lopez, & Carballeira, 1998). While these are important issues to address with particular client populations, they should not be considered "specific interventions" relating to clients who are culturally different from the social worker. These considerations apply to all clients regardless of their cultural background.

Earlier social work literature on ethnic competence reads like an introduction to basic social work interview methods, with an emphasis on listening carefully to the client, suspending judgment, and sorting out what is in the client's control and what is not (Devore & Schlesinger, 1981). The unique competencies associated with an ethnically sensitive practice or a culturally diverse practice are seemingly inseparable from sound clinical and traditional client-centered social work practice. If cultural competence cannot be differentiated from general social work practice, then it cannot be represented as a distinct knowledge area. Likewise, it will prove very difficult to assess in competency testing of social workers if it is diffused throughout every aspect of social work practice.

Thus, multiculturalism is best framed as a perspective toward others with a particular sensitivity to the full context of the client's identity, emotions, thoughts, and history. The following section proposes three primary arguments to support this approach.
- Walker, Robert & Michele Staton; Multiculturalism in social work ethics; Journal of Social Work Education; 2000, Vol. 36, Issue 3.
The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.

Personal Reflection Exercise #5
The preceding section contained information about multiculturalism in social work ethics.  Write three case study examples regarding how you might use the content of this section in your practice.

Ethics CEUs QUESTION 9
Which Section of the 1999 NASW Code of Ethics is most definitive about the content knowledge that the social worker must attain? Record the letter of the correct answer the Ethics CEUs Answer Booklet

 
Others who bought this Cross-Cultural Diversity Course
also bought…

Scroll DownScroll UpCourse Listing Bottom Cap

Ethics CEUs Answer Booklet for this course
Forward to Section 10
Back to Section 8
Table of Contents
Top

The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.
Response: ESSA & English-Language Learners - Classroom Q&A With Larry Ferlazzo - Education Week Teacher - January 01, 1970
Margo Gottlieb, Sarah Said, Catherine Beck, Heidi Pace, Heather Wolpert-Gawron, Tabitha Dell'Angelo, and Lindsey Moses share their thoughts about how The Every Student Succeeds Act will affect English Language Learners.
Alt-Right as the New Rebel: Adolescence in the Trump Era - Global Learning - Education Week - January 01, 1970
One educator's thoughts on student rebellion through adoption of alt-right views.
Celebrating Principals and Their Powerful Leadership Practices - Learning Forward's PD Watch - Education Week Teacher - January 01, 1970
Let's celebrate principals for all they do to lead learning and create environments where students and teachers can flourish.
LISTEN: Let Brotherly Love Continue: An All-Male Public School Opens (Raising Kings, Ep. 1) - Education Week - January 01, 1970
As Washington D.C.'s first all-male public high school opens, 100 9th graders will experience a school like none they have before—one that's grounded in love and empathy. This originally aired Oct. 18, 2017 on NPR's Code Switch.
Climate Change, Evolution Cause Curriculum Dust-Up in N.M. - Education Week - January 01, 1970
Amid intense pushback, state officials abandoned draft language in its science standards that did not reflect the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change and evolution.

CEU Continuing Education for
Social Worker CEU, Psychologist CEU, Counselor CEU, MFT CEU

 

OnlineCEUcredit.com Login


Forget your Password Reset it!