Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

DVD Cultural Diversity: Treating the LGBTQ "Coming Out" Conflict
LGBTQ continuing education MFT CEUs

Manual of Articles Sections 15 - 29
Section 15
The Diversity-Repressing Theory

CEU Question 15 | CEU Answer Booklet | Table of Contents | Homosexuality
Counselor CEUs, Psychologist CEs, Social Worker CEUs, MFT CEUs
According to the diversity-repressing theory for the benefit of sex, sex protects the genetic quality of the species. The diversity-repressing theory envisions that asexual species accumulate harmful mutations homosexuality LGBTQ Coming out Conflict counselor CEUover time and gradually become less functional, as though asexual lizards gradually lost the ability to run fast or digest some food. Sex supposedly counteracts this danger by allowing family lines that have picked up harmful mutations to recombine, producing offspring free of bad mutations. According to this theory, some offspring will possess both families' mutations and will die even more quickly, but other offspring will have none of the mutations, and will prosper on behalf of the species. According to this theory, without sex each and every family line inexorably accumulates mutations, leading eventually to species extinction.

Ending the Debate
Although both the diversity-affirming and diversity-repressing views have a long history, the time has come for closure. The time has come to reject the diversity-repressing view as both theoretically impossible and empirically vacuous. The scenario envisioned by the diversity-repressing theory can't exist. In an asexual species, when a bad gene arises, the line where the mutation originated is lost to natural selection, whereas the lines without the mutation prosper. The entire stock never deteriorates, because natural selection doesn't look the other way while a bad gene spreads. Instead, natural selection eliminates a bad gene when it first appears, preserving the overall functionality of the species. No evidence whatsoever shows asexual species becoming extinct because of a progressive accumulation of disabilities and loss of functionality. A bad gene never gets going in an asexual species, and sex's supposed pruning of the gene pool is unnecessary and mythical.

On the other hand, the environment does change from year to year, and individuals who don't do well one year may shine when conditions change, and vice versa. Butterflies whose enzymes work at cold temperatures thrive in dark, damp years, while butterflies whose enzymes function best at hot temperatures do better in sunny drought years. All butterflies are perfectly good butterflies, even if the abilities of some don't match the opportunities currently supplied by the environment.

I don't see any grounds for dignifying the diversity-repressing view for the benefit of sex as a viable alternative to the diversity-affirming view. To be agreeable, one might say both theories are valid. But this compromise isn't true. Conceding, even slightly, that one function of sex is to prune diversity puts forth a view that hasn't earned its place scientifically. Accepting a diversity-repressing view of sex simply to be polite admits through the back door a philosophical stance that may later be used to justify discrimination.

Therefore, I accept as a working premise that a species' biological rainbow is good-good because diversity allows a species to survive and prosper in continually changing conditions. I further accept that the purpose of sex is to maintain the rainbow's diversity, resynthesizing that diversity each generation in order to continually rebalance the genetic portfolio of the species. I reject the alternative theory that sex exists to prune the gene pool of bad diversity.
Darwinists have to take a consistent stand on the value of diversity. They can't maintain on the one hand that most variation is good because it's needed for natural selection and on the other hand also maintain that females must continually shop for males with the best genes as though most genes could be ranked from good to bad. Instead, I argue that almost all diversity is good and that female choice is more for the best match than for the best male.

How then should we assess the rainbows in our own species? We should be grateful that we do reproduce sexually, although we probably take this gift for granted. I feel too that we should conserve and embrace our rainbows. Affirming diversity is hard, very hard. We must come to accept ourselves and love our neighbors, regardless of color in the rainbow.
Overall, sex is essentially cooperative-a natural covenant to share genetic wealth. Sexual reproduction is not a battle.
-Roughgarden, Joan, Evolution's Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People, University of California Press Ltd: London, 2004

Personal Reflection Exercise Explanation

The Goal of this Home Study Course is to create a learning experience that enhances your clinical skills. We encourage you to discuss the Personal Reflection Journaling Activities, found at the end of each Section, with your colleagues. Thus, you are provided with an opportunity for a Group Discussion experience. Case Study examples might include: family background, socio-economic status, education, occupation, social/emotional issues, legal/financial issues, death/dying/health, home management, parenting, etc. as you deem appropriate. A Case Study is to be approximately 250 words in length. However, since the content of these “Personal Reflection” Journaling Exercises is intended for your future reference, they may contain confidential information and are to be applied as a “work in progress.” You will not be required to provide us with these Journaling Activities.
The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.

Personal Reflection Exercise #1
The preceding section contained information about the "Diversity-Repressing" theory. . Write three case study examples regarding how you might use the content of this section in your practice.

Online Continuing Education QUESTION 15
According to the diversity-repressing theory, what is the benefit of sex? Record the letter of the correct answer the CEU Answer Booklet.

Others who bought this LGBTQ Course
also bought…

Scroll DownScroll UpCourse Listing Bottom Cap

CEU Answer Booklet for this course | Homosexuality
Forward to Section 16 - Manual Article
Back to DVD Track 14
Table of Contents

The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.
Ex-Trump aide claims Teletubbies started ‘that whole trans thing’ - July 23, 2019
Unidentified participants in Teletubbies costumes march in the Cyprus Carnival Parade on March 2, 2014 in Limassol, CyprusThe Teletubbies haven't faced down LGBTQ rumors in 20 years, but leave it to a Trump sycophant to bring that back too.
Actress Bella Thorne just came out as pansexual: ‘Doesn’t have to be a girl or a guy’ - July 23, 2019
Bella ThorneThe Disney Channel actress said that she's actually pan, not bisexual.
Is there a link between autism & transgender or nonbinary people? - July 23, 2019
The numbers were largely driven by those assigned female at birth. 
American hate preacher gets banned from 33rd country - July 23, 2019
Steven AndersonHe's most famous for praising the Pulse shooter who killed 49 people in an LGBTQ club, but he also called for the death of Caitlyn Jenner.
New UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson refuses to apologize for homophobic comments - July 23, 2019
Boris JohnsonHe compared gay sex to having sex with animals, used anti-gay slurs, and mocked same-sex couples, but it's your fault if you took him wrong.

CEU Continuing Education for
Counselor CEUs, Psychologist CEUs, Social Worker CEUs, MFT CEUs

OnlineCEUcredit.com Login

Forget your Password Reset it!