Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

Teaching Parents Strategies for Difficult Teens
Difficult Teens continuing education addiction counselor CEUs

Section 25
Adolescent Attitude and Behavior Development:
Family Conflict Resolution Skills

CEU Question 25 | CE Test | Table of Contents | Parenting
Psychologist CEs, Social Worker CEUs, Counselor CEUs, MFT CEUs

Attitude and behavior development
The family appears to be an important context for the development of attitudes and behaviours through adolescence. Kandel and Andrews (1987) noted that parents' values are of particular influence in shaping fundamental adolescent beliefs relevant to education, work, and social relationships. Parents' behaviours also matter: for example, Australian research has tended to be consistent with overseas studies in finding parental substance use to be an important predictor of adolescent substance use (Williams et al. 2000).

Attitudes to health behaviours may be particularly malleable in late childhood and early adolescence, when decisions relevant to involvement in behaviours such as drug use are being made (Dielman 1994). Catalano and Hawkins (1996) summarised evidence suggesting that adolescent identification and modeling of parent attitudes and behaviours are typically mediated by family attachment, although not all studies concur (for example, Kandel and Andrews 1987).

Encouraging healthy adolescent separation
With the emergence of independent thinking and physical maturity, new horizons open for the adolescent, and parents may be seen as part of the childhood past. Parents often experience the adolescent's separation as a loss, and some level of parental grief is common. Family systems theorists have emphasised the inter-relationships in family emotions through this transition in their explanations of the genesis of some adolescent behaviour problems.

With decreasing influence of organised religion and little consensus in social values, sources of social integration outside the family can become more precarious than in the past. Adolescent separation from the family may be more difficult where the parent or adolescent has few social supports, is emotionally vulnerable, is unemployed, or has a lower capacity for independent functioning. By redoubling assistance to the adolescent, some parents temporarily avoid separation, but the consequence may be inhibited opportunity for the adolescent to develop independence. In other families, the adolescent may develop "problems" that require parental assistance (Stanton et al. 1982). Acknowledging the increasing complexity of the adolescent transition and providing social support for parents and adolescents are each important.

Reducing disharmony and family conflict
The adolescent is still developing coping strategies to manage the physical and social changes occurring through this period, and the consequence can be an increasing level of conflict within the family.

Conflict resolution skills can make an important contribution to family harmony and adolescent health through this phase. The parent's response through the early adolescent period represents a critical develop-mental transition factor. Acrimonious conflict with parents can undermine adolescent self-confidence, increase stress, and distance the adolescent from an important source of social support. For example, Brody and Forehand (1993) demonstrated that mother-adolescent conflict predicted early initiation of adolescent substance use.

In their management of the adolescent transition, parents model emotional and relationship skills that can influence the adolescent's approach to later social relationships and challenges. A number of parenting programs encourage parents to examine their own adolescent transition in understanding their response to the adolescent (for example, Jenkin and Bretherton 1994). Specific competencies developing through adolescence that appear to exert a later protective effect include anxiety management (Williams et al. 2000), problem solving (McCubbin et al. 1985), and conflict resolution (Paul et al. 2001).

Setting limits, enforcing consequences, encouraging responsibility
Typically, the process of adolescent separation is graded around small "first-time" events, such as going to town or visiting a friend alone. In making judgements, parents balance the requirement to encourage independence against that of ensuring safety. Parental monitoring and supervision are important factors influencing adolescent problem behaviour (Barnes et al. 1994).

Weatherburn and Lind (1998) predicted crime trends in Australian communities by modeling youth availability for delinquent peer activities as a function of parenting neglect. Assisting parents to develop age-appropriate methods of supervision, and establish a basis for reciprocity in providing material and other support, are important aims for intervention.

A further important role for parents through this period is the establishment of appropriate demands for an increasing contribution to family and household responsibilities (Baumrind 1991). In this context, Azrin et al. (1994) demonstrated adolescent substance abuse was influenced by the way in which parents supported and rewarded adolescent behaviour.

Evaluated family interventions
Interventions designed to support the adolescent transition years span a broad age range from around ten to 24 years. Programs have been based on a range of theories, including ecological and systems theories, cognitive-behavioural theories, and developmental theories. Many evaluations have built on the pioneering research of Stanton et al. (1982) and Alexander and colleagues (for example, Klein, Alexander and Parsons 1977). The body of knowledge is perhaps most advanced with respect to adolescent family intervention. More recent work has demonstrated the potential success of less intensive parent education strategies.

The selection below, which includes only a few of many interventions, mirrors the historical development of the field by beginning with more intensive programs (designed for families with multiple risk factors) and then generalising to less intensive whole-population prevention and early-intervention applications. A principal but not exclusive focus of the interventions included here is on the prevention and/or treatment of substance abuse; delinquency and crime are among other foci.

The interventions included were evaluated using a design that enabled a causal relationship between intervention exposure and outcomes to be inferred. Such designs typically require randomised assignment or adequate matching to a control group and longitudinal follow-up.

It should be noted that although the "evidencebased" approach offers a practical strategy for measuring effectiveness, the moderating effect of client and context differences has received limited attention. Furthermore, while many evaluations appear promising, it remains unclear whether these positive findings can be generalised beyond the original study teams or to wider population impacts.

Recruiting and engaging families
There are real challenges recruiting families into interventions. Typically, between 10 per cent and 50 per cent of families can be encouraged to enrol in interventions when invitations are extended to all parents within a defined population (universal interventions). Participating parents in early adolescent interventions tend to have higher levels of education (Spoth et al. 1997). Santisteban and Szapocznik (1994) described active recruitment methods that can be successfully employed in interventions aiming to attract disadvantaged families or youth with specific problems such as substance abuse.

Once parents enter interventions, a further challenge is that of engagement (of encouraging interest and retention). Typically, around 60-80 per cent of parents can be retained through all sessions of universal parent education interventions (Spoth et al. 1999).

Family interventions for those with multiple risk factors
Interventions targeting multiple risk families are typically conducted in settings such as drug treatment, juvenile justice and school welfare. Family therapy is often approached reluctantly by government, due to perceptions of undefined length and expense. However, considerable work has been done to better quantify the investment required. A number of research teams has presented evidence supporting the effectiveness of manualised forms of family therapy in the treatment of youth drug abuse (Szapocznik et al. 1988; Liddle and Dakof 1995).

The Addicts and Families Project was historically important in its use of a well-controlled evaluation to demonstrate the effectiveness of family therapy as a treatment for youth substance abuse (Stanton et al. 1982). The study demonstrated that, after six months, supplementing methadone treatment with family therapy reduced drug use in around two-thirds of cases.

Functional Family Therapy has provided leader-ship in the movement to disseminate brief family therapy using a clearly staged (readily taught) family counselling program involving as few as eight hours of therapist contact. Evaluations have demonstrated reductions in juvenile justice expenditure and prevention of offending amongst the younger siblings of targeted offenders (Klein et al. 1977).

The family is only one of the important social systems impacting on adolescent development.
The Multisystemic Treatment program is based on family systems principles, but extends assistance to serious juvenile offenders by including effective intervention strategies to enhance individual competence, tackle peer relationship issues, and ensure access to work, education and community resources. Exposure to the program reduced offending and re-arrests (Cunningham and Henggeler 1999) relative to usual juvenile justice practices. The program appeared more effective than individual counselling in reducing antisocial behaviour for serious adolescent offenders (Borduin et al. 1995), and was effective in engaging families with multiple and complex problems (Cunningham and Henggeler 1999).

The successful application of multisystem casework has inspired applications for younger adolescents. The Targeted Adolescent/Family Multisystems Intervention program uses an individual-focused intervention for high school students and parents. The program is designed for late primary/early high school students evidencing poor school performance and substance misuse or abuse. Bry et al. (1998) reported reduced substance use in the second year. The Families and Schools Together program also targets families where students are identified to have behaviour, learning, or attendance problems in late primary school (McDonald et al. (1991). The program has been successfully trialed in Victoria, beginning in 1997 (Grima 2000).
- Toumbourou, J. W., & Gregg, M. E. (2009). Working with Families to Promote Healthy Adolescent Development. Family Matters, (59), 54-60. Retrieved from https://aifs.gov.au/sites/default/files/jt.pdf

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
Bornstein, M. H., & Putnick, D. L. (2021). Dyadic development in the family: Stability in mother–child relationship quality from infancy to adolescence. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(4), 445–456.

Ogbaselase, F. A., Mancini, K. J., & Luebbe, A. M. (2020). Indirect effect of family climate on adolescent depression through emotion regulatory processes. Emotion.

Thomson, R. A., Overall, N. C., Cameron, L. D., & Low, R. S. T. (2018). Perceived regard, expressive suppression during conflict, and conflict resolution. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(6), 722–732.

Zhou, N., & Buehler, C. (2017). Adolescents’ responses to marital conflict: The role of cooperative marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(7), 910–921.

Online Continuing Education QUESTION 25
A further important role for parents is the establishment of appropriate demands for an increasing contribution to family and household responsibilities.  What was found that supports this statement? Record the letter of the correct answer the CE Test.

Others who bought this Parenting Course
also bought…

Scroll DownScroll UpCourse Listing Bottom Cap

CE Test for this course | Parenting
Forward to Section 26
Back to Section 24
Table of Contents

CEU Continuing Education for
Psychologist CEUs, Social Worker CEUs, Counselor CEUs, MFT CEUs

OnlineCEUcredit.com Login

Forget your Password Reset it!