Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

Effectively Treating Pathological Self-Criticism in Depressed & Dysthymic Clients
Effectively Treating Pathological Self-Criticism in Depressed and Dysthymic Clients

Manual of Articles Sections 15 - 27
Section 15
An Evolutionary Perspective of the Origins of
Self-Criticism and Depression

CEU Question 15 | CEU Answer Booklet | Table of Contents
Social Worker CEUs, Psychologist CEs, Counselor CEUs, MFT CEUs, Nurse CEUs

Evolutionary thinkers have proposed that depression has an adaptive purpose. For example, social rank theory (Gilbert 2000; Price, 1969, 1972; Price & Sloman, 1987; Sloman, Price, Gilbert, & Gardner, social behaviour Pathological Self-Criticism  mft CEU1994) suggests that the functional value of depression is to inhibit the attainment of resources while signaling to dominant conspecifics that they will not be challenged for resources or for status. In this manner, the depressed organism saves itself from injury. In situations of conflict or defeat, one side will typically adopt an ‘involuntary subordinate strategy’ (ISS), which prevents further conflict and signals to the opponent that the submissive individual is no longer a threat (Allan & Gilbert, 1997; Gardner & Price, 1999; Gilbert, 2000). Most mammalian species are group-living, and submissive behaviour on the part of subordinates allows for the continued stability and cohesion of the group (Gilbert, 1989). A failure of one party to engage in submissive behaviours would result in continuous ‘ritual agonistic behaviour’ (i.e. displays or fighting) that would in turn cause serious injury, death, or the ousting of weaker individuals (Gilbert, 1989).

In contrast to voluntary submissiveness, which serves many purposes and is often healthy, involuntary submissiveness is associated with depression and other forms of psychopathology (Allan & Gilbert, 1997; Gilbert, 2000; Gilbert, Allan, & Trent, 1995).  Sloman et al. (1994) have argued that the ISS can account for all of the facets of depression.

By understanding the functions of the ISS we can account for the biological state of depression, the psychological preoccupations (self as inferior, worthless, and powerless), the anxieties (e.g. social and separation), the social behaviour (inhibited, retarded) and the triggers of depression (major losses of allies and friends that reduce self-esteem and confidence, loss of status, and devaluing, rejecting environments, pp. 404–405).

The constructs of social comparison and arrested flight are derived from social rank theory and were hypothesized to be particularly relevant for the personality style of self-criticism, a vulnerability marker for depression. This personality type will be described following a summary of evolutionary constructs.

Social comparison
Allan and Gilbert (1995, 1997) have suggested that, in the human species, conflicts rarely come to physical blows. Instead, individuals find their place in a hierarchy through social comparisons in advance of conflict. In essence, social comparison may be useful in determining those who are stronger or weaker, and those who can or cannot be challenged. These comparisons include the relative status of the individual as well as the social attractiveness or popularity of the individual to others. It has been noted that social attractiveness may be more relevant for obtaining rank in humans than intimidation or open conflict (Allan & Gilbert, 1995, 1997). In support of this model, poor social comparisons have been linked to submissiveness and depression (Allan & Gilbert, 1995; Gilbert et al., 1995).

A model for social anxiety has also been proposed, which asserts that socially anxious individuals operate within a defence system where frequent social comparison and a readiness to submit predominate (Gilbert, 1989; Trower & Gilbert, 1989; Trower, Gilbert, & Sherling, 1990). Social anxiety is primarily geared towards threat and functions to avoid attacks that would result in a loss of status. The distinction with the social rank theory of depression revolves primarily around triggers. Whereas defeat is thought to precede a depressive episode, future threats underlie the dynamics of anxiety.

Arrested flight
In a conflict situation, the first instinct of an animal is either to take flight or fight the opponent. When a weaker, or subordinate, organism is unable to escape (e.g. because possible escape routes are blocked), a behavioural state termed ‘arrested flight’ occurs (Dixon, Fisch, Huber, & Walser, 1989). The threatened animal typically becomes demobilized, covers the eyes or ears, and turns the head away. In this way, the organism stops signals to the source of the threat that would lead to an attack while at the same time cutting off incoming signals that are disturbing and would prompt it to take flight. Within the social rank theory, arrested flight can be viewed as a de-escalation strategy designed to inhibit the attack of dominant conspecifics (Gilbert & Allan, 1998).

In humans, it is thought that inescapable life situations lead to entrapment and an arrested flight state (Gilbert & Allan, 1998). Support for this idea comes from the work of Brown, Harris, and Hepworth (1995) who found that entrapment or humiliating experiences, frequently occurring in the context of a loss, predicted the onset of depression better than other categories of severe life events. More specifically, entrapment or humiliating events were three times more likely to predict depressive episodes than loss alone.

Gilbert and Allan (1998) have developed scales to measure the degree of external and internal entrapment. External entrapment can be defined as a motivation to escape from current circumstances while at the same time feeling stuck or trapped. Internal entrapment also involves a motivation to escape and a perception of being trapped but it is in reference to one’s own thoughts or feelings. In support of these constructs, both internal and external entrapment scales have been related to social comparison as well as depression, even when controlling for hopelessness (Gilbert & Allan, 1998).

Dependency and self-criticism
Blatt and Shichman (1983) described two personality styles that predispose people to depression. First, the ‘anaclitic,’ or dependent personality configuration is marked by loneliness, helplessness, and fears of abandonment (Blatt & Zuroff, 1992). Blatt and Zuroff (1992) noted that dependent individuals require people to nurture and protect them. Dependency consistently shows a modest, but significant, association with depression (Blatt & Zuroff, 1992; Nietzel & Harris, 1990).

The self-critical personality was the focus of investigation as it was expected to lend itself particularly well to an evolutionary account of depressive vulnerability. This personality configuration involves issues of identity and self-worth. People who are highly self-critical tend to be achievement oriented, competitive, and very hard on themselves (Blatt & Zuroff, 1992). An unforgiving performance standard is coupled with self-loathing and guilt. Not surprisingly, this personality style is statistically highly associated with depressive symptomatology (Blatt & Zuroff, 1992; Nietzel & Harris, 1990).

A large amount of construct validity has been obtained for the two personality styles, as measured by the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ; Blatt, D’Afflitti, & Quinlan, 1976). For instance, Zuroff, Moskowitz, Wielgus, Powers, and Franko (1983) found that dependency was associated with guilt over hostility, an external locus of control indicating helplessness, and, for males, lower task leadership and lower masculinity. Self-criticism, on the other hand, was related to moral guilt, low self-esteem, and, in females, to lower social desirability and increased Machiavellinism (willingness to manipulate others). Other research has also supported Blatt’s model, showing that dependency and self-criticism are predictably associated with phenomena ranging from reactivity to particular stressors (Mongrain & Zuroff, 1994; Zuroff & Mongrain, 1987), choice of romantic partners (Zuroff & de Lorimier, 1989), behaviours in close relationships (Mongrain, 1998; Mongrain, Vetesse, Shuster, & Kendal, 1998), and particular childhood experiences (Amitay, Mongrain, & Fazaa, 2004; McCranie & Bass, 1984).

There is preliminary evidence linking self-criticism to social rank theory. For example, Santor and Zuroff (1997) have found self-critical women to be particularly attuned to matters of social status. These women were more likely than non-self-critical women to contest threats to status when outperformed by a friend on a bogus computer task. They were also more likely to withhold praise from their friends if a friend had disagreed with them. This was interpreted as retaliation against threats to status (Santor & Zuroff, 1997). This research therefore suggests that self-critical women are very competitive and sensitive to issues pertaining to status and social ranking. In a subsequent study, Santor, Pringle, and Israeli (2000) assigned 36 couples to a task and gave them bogus feedback that was either favourable or unfavourable.

After unfavourable feedback, self-critical people disagreed with their partners, blamed them more for their joint performance, and made fewer suggestions. Therefore, even in a cooperative situation, self-critics were more sensitive to how their team performance affected their own status.

Santor (2003) has articulated a threat-based model of vulnerability for dependency and self-criticism where each of these personality configurations is associated with different unfulfilled needs. Dependent individuals have unmet attachment needs for emotional closeness, whereas self-critics need admiration and status. When those needs are threatened by external events (such as failure to get promoted), the self-critic will become depressed if behavioural strategies aimed at regulating status are unsuccessful.

- Sturman, Edward D.; Mongrain, Myriam; Self-criticism and major depression: An evolutionary perspective; British Journal of Clinical Psychology; Nov2005, Vol. 44 Issue 4

=================================
Personal Reflection Exercise Explanation
The Goal of this Home Study Course is to create a learning experience that enhances your clinical skills. We encourage you to discuss the Personal Reflection Journaling Activities, found at the end of each Section, with your colleagues. Thus, you are provided with an opportunity for a Group Discussion experience. Case Study examples might include: family background, socio-economic status, education, occupation, social/emotional issues, legal/financial issues, death/dying/health, home management, parenting, etc. as you deem appropriate. A Case Study is to be approximately 225 words in length. However, since the content of these “Personal Reflection” Journaling Exercises is intended for your future reference, they may contain confidential information and are to be applied as a “work in progress.” You will not be required to provide us with these Journaling Activities.

Personal Reflection Exercise #1
The preceding section contained information regarding depression’s and self-criticism’s origin, from an evolutionary perspective.  Write three case study examples regarding how you might use the content of this section in your practice.

Online Continuing Education QUESTION 15
What do self-critics require from others? Record the letter of the correct answer the CEU Answer Booklet.

 
Others who bought this Depression Course
also bought…

Scroll DownScroll UpCourse Listing Bottom Cap

CEU Answer Booklet for this course
Forward to Section 16 - Manual Article
Back to CD Track 14
Table of Contents
Top

CEU Continuing Education for
Social Work CEUs, Psychology CEUs, Counselor CEUs, MFT CEUs, Nurse CEUs
Effectively Treating Pathological Self-Criticism in Depressed and Dysthymic Clients

OnlineCEUcredit.com Login


Forget your Password Reset it!