Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

Long-term Care Communication Techniques with Dementia & Alzheimer's
Aging continuing education psychologist CEUs

Section 12
Home Alone Clients with Dementia

CEU Question 12 | CEU Answer Booklet | Table of Contents | Geriatric & Aging
Psychologist CEs, Counselor CEUs, Social Worker CEUs, MFT CEUs

In Webber et al.'s (1994) and our two studies, elderly persons with dementia living alone in the community were mostly women. In Webber et al.'s study and Study 2, those who were living alone were older. These findings dementia Aging social work continuing edwould be expected as women typically live longer than men, and their spouses tend to be older than themselves and predecease them.

Unlike Webber et al.'s study and Study 1, the cognitive status of those living alone in Study 2 did not differ from those living with spouses. The fact that both cognitive status and overall physical functioning status at the point they contacted the community psychogeriatric team were very similar between the two groups might be related to the fact that this sample was already identified as needing assistance and were referred to the psychogeriatric team. That is, when a certain level of cognitive impairment was identifiable, referrals to the community psychogeriatric program were initiated. However, it is still noteworthy that those living alone, though older, were exhibiting the same cognitive status as the younger people living with spouses.

Home-delivered meals were used more frequently by those living alone than those living with others in all three studies. Homemaker service was more frequently used by those living alone than those living with others in both Study 1 and Webber et al.'s study, but did not differ between groups in Study 2. In fact, in Study 2, those living with spouses were using this service more frequently than those living alone. This may relate to the use of this service as relief for the caregiver and thus was more frequently made available as a service to the spouse (rather than to assist the person with dementia).

One of the purposes of Study 2 was to explore more fully informal services that were used by those living alone, in terms of family and neighbor involvement in providing care. Results showed that elderly people with dementia living alone had less local family than those living with a spouse, which could be one of the reasons why they live alone. Those living alone who had local family might have been identified at younger ages and encouraged to live with families or move into group living situations. Therefore, it is possible that our sample of persons living alone continued to do so because of the lack of local family support, not because they are less impaired.

Also, more practical help was provided by non-live in, non-spousal relatives and neighbors for those living alone. This finding corroborates Webber et al.'s results, where the involvement of neighbors and friends as caregivers was greater for those living alone. Perhaps this informal support is at least as effective as less flexible agency support, in caring for this particular population. On the other hand, spouses have less informal support in taking care of a demented spouse. This may suggest that these spouses are socially isolated in their role from relatives and friends, and that formal services do not compensate for this. In our experience, this sense of isolation is frequently identified by spousal caregivers as a source of burden/stress and may account, to some extent, for the fact that their partners do not remain longer in the community than those living alone.

Study 2 also showed that people living alone did not die more often in the community than those living with spouses, as might have been expected for the group. However, since the Study 2 sample was already known to and using formal services, this might not be representative of what is happening generally in the community. We do not know about those who are not using any services. Often people living alone tend to express strong desires to remain at home, in spite of risks, and dying at home would be a natural consequence for many.

The results for assessment of risk show that people living alone are at much greater risk than those living with a spouse. However, the risks dealt with here are risks 'perceived' by clinicians. Clinicians who assess risk potentials may assume that those living with spouses are at lower risk because of the presence of the spouse, and those living alone at greater risk because they live alone. If those living alone were really at greater risk, they might be expected to die or be placed in facilities sooner than those living with spouses. At least in this study, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the length of the stay in the community or outcome, in terms of institutionalization or death.

Our finding that none of our selected variables contributed significantly to use of service when examined together suggest: (1) the difference observed between groups on the use of home-delivered meals must be viewed with caution; and (2) other domains need to be considered when determining who uses services, at least for clients of CPTs.

At this point the differences between the samples for Webber et al. (1994), Study 1 and Study 2 must be noted. Webber et al.'s cases were attending an Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Center in California. The participants in Study 1 were drawn from a nationwide epidemiologic study of dementia in Canada. The participants in Study 2 were all persons with dementia referred to a community-based mental health team. Thus, in these three different samples some consistencies have merged. The observed differences in the findings may be, at least in part, a function of these sampling differences.

Certainly the issues involved in providing formal care (i.e. use of services) to persons with dementia living alone in the community are complex and additional investigations are warranted. The identification of persons at high risk of harm would appear to be of crucial importance. Our failure to find an association between perceived risk and service use may be a function of the way risk was measured. Our finding that those living alone were not at greater risk of institutionalization or death despite being older than those living with spouses may have occurred as a function of this sample (clients of a CPT) but raise the question 'at risk for what?'. It may be that this sample would show increased hospitalizations for nutrition- or medication-related problems or may have been abused financially had we been able to examine risk more directly.

Tierney (1997) suggests that the most important predictors of harm for persons with cognitive impairment living alone may be: (1) the etiology of the cognitive impairment; (2) the kinds of cognitive deficits exhibited; (3) the behavior disturbances present; and (4) existing social resources. Whether or not people with dementia living alone are indeed at increased risk of harm and how to predict those who will experience significant harm are yet to be determined. Furthermore, the interface between risk and service use is not at all clear. However, it is clear that efforts to understand these relations must continue so we may best meet the needs of persons with dementia within our society.
- Tuokko, H., & P. Maccourt; Home Alone with Dementia; Aging & Mental Health; Feb 1999, Vol. 3, Issue 1.
The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.

Personal Reflection Exercise #3
The preceding section contained information about older adults being home alone with dementia. Write three case study examples regarding how you might use the content of this section in your practice.

Online Continuing Education QUESTION 12
According to Tierney, what are the four most important predictors of harm for persons with cognitive impairment living alone? Record the letter of the correct answer the CEU Answer Booklet.

Others who bought this Aging/Dementia Course
also bought…

Scroll DownScroll UpCourse Listing Bottom Cap

CEU Answer Booklet for this course | Geriatric & Aging
Forward to Section 13
Back to Section 11
Table of Contents

The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.
Experiences of stroke survivors with visual impairments examined - August 17, 2017
A new study identifies simple measures that could substantially improve the quality of life of stroke survivors with visual impairments.
Smoking linked to frailty in older adults - August 17, 2017
A recent article finds that current smoking in older people increases the risk of developing frailty, though former smokers did not appear to be at higher risk.
Subarachnoid hemorrhage and the need for expert treatment - August 16, 2017
Subarachnoid hemorrhages, which are caused by ruptured brain aneurysms, account for 5-10 percent of all strokes and are best managed by experienced and dedicated experts at high-volume centers with neurosurgeons, endovascular surgeons and stroke neurologists, research shows.
Telemedicine as effective as in-person care for Parkinson's disease - August 16, 2017
Telemedicine can successfully deliver quality care, new findings from a nationwide program that links neurologists with patients with Parkinson's disease in their homes via video conferencing shows. The study points to a new way to improve care for people who suffer from the disease, but may have not have access to a neurologist.
Evidence does not support the use of gabapentinoids for chronic low back pain - August 15, 2017
Existing evidence on the use of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain (CLBP) is limited, and demonstrates significant risk of adverse effects with no benefits on pain relief, according to a recent meta-analysis.

CEU Continuing Education for
Psychology CEUs, Counselor CEUs, Social Worker CEUs, MFT CEUs

OnlineCEUcredit.com Login

Forget your Password Reset it!