|Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979|
Manual of Articles Sections 15 - 28
According to Caplan (1964:40), there are four developmental phases in a crisis:
Whenever a stressful event occurs, there are certain recognized balancing factors that can effect a return to equilibrium; these are perception of the event, available situational supports, and coping mechanisms as shown in Fig. 1. The upper portion of the paradigm illustrates the “normal” initial reaction of an individual to a stressful event. A stressful event is seldom so clearly defined that its source can be determined immediately. Internalized changes occur at the same time as the externally provoked F stress, and as a result, some events may cause a strong emotional response in one person, yet leave another apparently unaffected. Much is determined by the presence or absence of factors that can effect a return to equilibrium. In column A of Fig. 1 the balancing factors are operating and crisis is avoided. However, in column B the absence of one or more of these balancing factors may block resolution of the problem, thus increasing disequilibrium and precipitating crisis.
Chronic Psychiatric Patient—theoretical concepts
Situational supports are those persons in the environment whom the therapist can find to lend support to the individual. A patient may be living with his family or friends; are they concerned enough—and do they care enough—to give him help? The patient’s situational supports can serve as “assistants” to the therapist and the patient. They are with him daily and are encouraged to have frequent communication with the therapist. Usually situational supports are included in some part of the therapy sessions. This provides them with the knowledge and information they need to help the “identified” patient. If the patient is living in a board-and-care facility, one must determine if any of its members are concerned and willing to work with the therapist to help the individual through the stressful period. This involves visits to the facility and conducting collateral or group therapy with the patient and other members to get and keep them involved in helping to resolve the crisis.
Occasionally the patient has no situational supports. He may be a social isolate; he may have no family and may have acquaintances but no real friends with whom he can talk about his problems. Usually an individual such as this has many difficulties in interpersonal relationships at work and school and socially. It is then the therapist’s role to provide situational support while the patient is in therapy.
Our experiences have verified for us that crisis intervention can be an effective therapy modality with chronic psychiatric patients. If a psychiatric patient with a history of repeated hospitalizations returns to the community and his family, his reentry creates many stresses. While much has been accomplished to remove the stigma of mental illness, people are still wary and hypervigilant when they learn that a “former mental patient” has returned home to his community. In his absence the family and community have, consciously or unconsciously, eliminated him from their usual life patterns and activities. They then have to readjust to his presence and include him in activities and decision making. If for any reason he does not conform to their expectations, they want him removed so that they can continue their lives without his possible disruptive behavior.
The first area to explore is to determine who is in crisis: the patient or his family. In many cases the family is overreacting because of its anxiety and is seeking some means of getting the “identified” patient back into the hospital. The patient is usually brought to the center by a family member because his original maladaptive symptoms have begun to reemerge. Questioning the patient or his family about medication he received from the hospital and determining if he is taking it as prescribed are essential. If the patient is unable to communicate with the therapist about what has happened or what has changed in his life, the family is questioned as to what might have precipitated his return to his former psychotic behavior. There is usually a cause-and-effect relationship between a change, or anticipated change, in the routine patterns of life-style or family constellation and the beginnings of abnormal overt behavior in the identified patient. Often families forget or ignore telling a former psychiatric patient when they are contemplating a change because “he wouldn’t understand.” Such changes could include moving or changing jobs. This is perceived by the patient as exclusion or rejection by the family and creates stress that he is unable to cope with; thus he retreats to his previous psychotic behavior. Such cases are frequent and can be dealt with through the theoretical framework of crisis intervention methodology.
Rubinstein (1972) stated that family-focused crisis intervention usually brings about the resolution of the patient’s crisis without resorting to hospitalization. In a later article in 1974, he advocated that family crisis intervention can also be viable alternative to rehospitalization. Here the emphasis is placed on the period immediately after the patient’s release from the hospital. He suggested that conjoint family therapy begin in the hospital before the patient’s release and then continue in an outpatient clinic after his release. His approach has also served to develop the concept that a family can and should share responsibility for the patient’s treatment.
In Decker’s 1972 study, two groups of young adults were followed for 2-12 years after their first psychiatric hospitalization. The first group was immediately hospitalized and received traditional modes of treatment, and the second group was hospitalized after the institution of a crisis-intervention program. The results of the study indicated that crisis intervention reduced long-term hospital dependency without producing alternate forms of psychological or social dependency and also reduced the number of rehospitalizations.
- Aguilera PhD, Donna C. and Janice M. Messick, M.S.; Crisis Intervention: Theory and methodology; The C.V. Mosby Company: St. Louis; 1982The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.
Reflection Exercise #1
Online Continuing Education QUESTION
Others who bought this Crisis Course
CEU Continuing Education for
Counselor CEUs, Social Worker CEUs, Psychology CEUs, MFT CEUs