Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

How to Ethically Set Client Confidentiality Boundaries
Ethics Confidentiality Boundaries CEU Continuing Education for

Section 7
Ethics and Managing Dual Relationships

CEU Question 7 | Ethics CEU Answer Booklet | Table of Contents | Confidentiality
Counselor CEUs, Psychologist CEs, Social Worker CEUs, MFT CEUs

Ethics - Managing Dual Relationships
To manage boundary issues effectively, mental health professionals must develop a clear understanding of what distinguishes ethical and unethical dual relationships. A dual relationship is unethical when it has several Red flags How to Ethically Set Client counselor CEUcharacteristics (Corey & Herlihy, 1997; Epstein, 1994; NASW, 2000; Reamer, 1998a, 2001b), such as that the relationship is likely to

• interfere with the mental health professional's exercise of professional discretion
• interfere with the mental health professional's exercise of impartial judgment
• exploit clients, colleagues, or third parties to further the mental health professional's personal interests
• harm clients, colleagues, or third parties.

Mental health professionals must be especially careful to consider how cultural and ethnic norms are relevant to boundary issues (see NASW, 2000, Standard 1.05; see also Lee & Kurilla, 1997; Pinderhughes, 1994). For example, a mental health professional who conducts home visits may be reluctant to accept a family member's invitation to join the family for a meal, but may agree to have crackers and a nonalcoholic beverage so as not to violate the family's deep-seated ethnic norms related to offering food to guests. Similar issues may arise related to mental health professionals' attending family life cycle events. A pregnant community organizer may need to be very tactful when residents of a largely ethnic community invite the mental health professional to a neighborhood-sponsored shower held in her behalf. The mental health professional would need to think through the implications of attending the event and accepting gifts. As the NASW Code of Ethics (2000) states,

In instances when dual or multiple relationships are unavoidable, mental health professionals should take steps to protect clients and are responsible for setting clear, appropriate, and culturally sensitive boundaries. [italics added] (Standard 1.06[c])
To protect clients and minimize possible harm--and to minimize the possibility of ethics complaints and lawsuits that allege misconduct or professional negligence--mental health professionals should establish clear "risk management" criteria and procedures. A sound risk management protocol to deal with boundary issues should contain six major elements:

  1. Be alert to potential or actual conflicts of interest.
  2. Inform clients and colleagues about potential or actual conflicts of interest; explore reasonable remedies.
  3. Consult colleagues and supervisors, and relevant professional literature, regulations, policies, and ethical standards (codes of ethics) to identify pertinent boundary issues and constructive options.
  4. Design a plan of action that addresses the boundary issues and protects the parties involved to the greatest extent possible.
  5. Document all discussions, consultation, supervision, and other steps taken to address boundary issues.
  6. Develop a strategy to monitor implementation of action plan.

First, mental health professionals should always be vigilant in their efforts to be alert to potential or actual conflicts of interest in their relationships with clients and colleagues. Mental health professionals should be cognizant of "red flags" that may signal a boundary problem. For example, clinical mental health professionals should be wary of situations in which they find themselves attracted to a particular client, going out of their way to extend the client's counseling sessions (facilitated by scheduling the favored client at the end of the day), treating the client as someone "special," disclosing confidential information about other clients, acting impulsively in relation to the client, allowing the client to accumulate a large unpaid bill, and disclosing very personal details to the client (Simon, 1999). Similarly, nonclinical mental health professionals (for example, administrators, researchers, community organizers) should be alert to comparable warning signs, such as granting extraordinary special favors to clients or colleagues and granting unprecedented exceptions to clients or colleagues who have not fulfilled contractual agreements.

Second, mental health professionals should inform clients and appropriate colleagues when they encounter boundary issues, including actual or potential conflicts of interest, and explore reasonable remedies. Third, mental health professionals should consult colleagues and supervisors; relevant professional literature, regulations, and policies; and ethical standards (relevant codes of ethics) to identify pertinent boundary issues and constructive options. Special care should be taken in high-risk circumstances. For example, clinical mental health professionals who attempt to make decisions about a possible friendship with a former client should consider prevailing ethical standards that take into consideration such factors as the amount of time that has passed since the termination of the professional-client relationship; the extent to which the former client is mentally competent and emotionally stable; the issues addressed in the professional-client relationship; the length of the professional-client relationship; the circumstances surrounding the termination of the professional-client relationship; the amount of influence the mental health professional has in the client's life; available, reasonable alternatives; and the extent to which there is foreseeable harm to the former client or others as a result of the new relationship (Ebert, 1997; Reamer, 1998a).

Fourth, mental health professionals should design a plan of action that addresses the boundary issues and protects clients, colleagues, and third parties to the greatest extent possible. In some circumstances, protecting a client's interests may require termination of the professional relationship with proper referral of the client. It is particularly useful for mental health professionals to imagine how a thoughtful panel of peers in the profession would perceive their course of action. Fifth, mental health professionals should document all discussions, consultations, supervision, and other steps taken to address boundary issues (for example, consultation with colleagues or supervisors about whether to accept a client's invitation to attend a life cycle event or terminate services to a client when conflict of interest issues arise). Finally, mental health professionals should develop a strategy to monitor the implementation of their action plan, for example, by periodically assessing with relevant parties (clients, colleagues, supervisors, and lawyers) whether the strategy minimized or eliminated the boundary problems.

To promote practitioners' actual implementation of this protocol, mental health professionals can sponsor staff training and continuing education workshops. In addition to presenting conceptual content related to boundary issues and dual relationships, such workshops can role-play realistic case scenarios to enhance mental health professionals' ability to protect clients, colleagues, and third parties, and to reduce risk.

There is no question that mental health professionals have developed a richer, more nuanced understanding of boundary issues in the profession. To further enhance this understanding, mental health professionals must examine dual relationships that are exploitive in nature and those that are more ambiguous. Practitioners' firm grasp of boundary issues involving their intimate relationships with clients and colleagues, responses to their own emotional and dependency needs, pursuits of personal benefits, altruistic gestures, and responses to unanticipated circumstances will increase their ability to protect clients, colleagues, and themselves. Most important, skillful management of boundary issues enhances mental health's ethical integrity, one of the key hallmarks of a profession.
- Reamer, Frederic; Boundary issues in social work: managing dual relationships; Social work; Jan 2003; Vol. 48; Issue 1.
The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.

Personal Reflection Exercise #3
The preceding section contained information about managing dual relationships. Write three case study examples regarding how you might use the content of this section in your practice.

Ethics CEU QUESTION 7
According to Reamer, what are the six elements of a sound risk management protocol to deal with boundary issues? Record the letter of the correct answer the Ethics CEU Answer Booklet

 
Others who bought this Confidentiality Course
also bought…

Scroll DownScroll UpCourse Listing Bottom Cap

Ethics CEU Answer Booklet for this course | Confidentiality
Forward to Section 8
Back to Section 6
Table of Contents
Top

The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.
Melissa Achieves HIPAA Compliance - Broadway World - Broadway World - June 26, 2017

Melissa Achieves HIPAA Compliance - Broadway World
Broadway World
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA - Melissa, a leading provider of global contact data quality and identity verification solutions, today announced it has ...

and more »
SecureNetMD is hosting a free HIPAA compliance seminar - Technical.ly Delaware - May 31, 2017

Technical.ly Delaware

SecureNetMD is hosting a free HIPAA compliance seminar
Technical.ly Delaware
... legal matters and compliance auditing. “Our primary commitment is to ensure that all attendees exit this seminar with a better understanding of what HIPAA Compliance is and what can be expected with OCR HIPAA Compliance Auditing,” said Berberian.

and more »
Best Practices for HIPAA Compliance and Beyond - Lexology (registration) - June 08, 2017

Best Practices for HIPAA Compliance and Beyond
Lexology (registration)
Sharon R. Klein (CIPP/US), a partner in the Health Sciences Department of Pepper Hamilton, chair of the Privacy, Security and Data Protection practice and a leader of the Technology practice and the Digital Health practice, spoke at the Healthcare ...

HIPAA Settlements in April and May Highlight Key Compliance Concerns for OCR - JD Supra (press release) - June 21, 2017

HIPAA Settlements in April and May Highlight Key Compliance Concerns for OCR
JD Supra (press release)
After a break in March with no new settlement agreements, OCR returned in April and May with quite a few. The Health Care Data Aware Blog already posted about a $400,000 OCR settlement released April 12, 2017, which can be read here. This post will ...

Keeping Telemedicine HIPAA Compliant - HIT Consultant - June 20, 2017

HIT Consultant

Keeping Telemedicine HIPAA Compliant
HIT Consultant
This makes HIPAA compliance and data security more important than ever before. As PHI and health services are put into the hands of more service providers outside traditional settings it's imperative that healthcare organizations and their business ...



CEU Continuing Education for
Social Work CEUs, Psychology CEUs, Counselor CEUs, MFT CEUs

.

OnlineCEUcredit.com Login


Forget your Password Reset it!