Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979
Add to Shopping Cart

DVD Cultural Diversity: Treating the LGBTQ "Coming Out" Conflict
LGBTQ continuing education MFT CEUs

Manual of Articles Sections 15 - 29
Section 15
The Diversity-Repressing Theory

CEU Question 15 | CEU Answer Booklet | Table of Contents | Homosexuality
Counselor CEUs, Psychologist CEs, Social Worker CEUs, MFT CEUs
According to the diversity-repressing theory for the benefit of sex, sex protects the genetic quality of the species. The diversity-repressing theory envisions that asexual species accumulate harmful mutations homosexuality LGBTQ Coming out Conflict counselor CEUover time and gradually become less functional, as though asexual lizards gradually lost the ability to run fast or digest some food. Sex supposedly counteracts this danger by allowing family lines that have picked up harmful mutations to recombine, producing offspring free of bad mutations. According to this theory, some offspring will possess both families' mutations and will die even more quickly, but other offspring will have none of the mutations, and will prosper on behalf of the species. According to this theory, without sex each and every family line inexorably accumulates mutations, leading eventually to species extinction.

Ending the Debate
Although both the diversity-affirming and diversity-repressing views have a long history, the time has come for closure. The time has come to reject the diversity-repressing view as both theoretically impossible and empirically vacuous. The scenario envisioned by the diversity-repressing theory can't exist. In an asexual species, when a bad gene arises, the line where the mutation originated is lost to natural selection, whereas the lines without the mutation prosper. The entire stock never deteriorates, because natural selection doesn't look the other way while a bad gene spreads. Instead, natural selection eliminates a bad gene when it first appears, preserving the overall functionality of the species. No evidence whatsoever shows asexual species becoming extinct because of a progressive accumulation of disabilities and loss of functionality. A bad gene never gets going in an asexual species, and sex's supposed pruning of the gene pool is unnecessary and mythical.

On the other hand, the environment does change from year to year, and individuals who don't do well one year may shine when conditions change, and vice versa. Butterflies whose enzymes work at cold temperatures thrive in dark, damp years, while butterflies whose enzymes function best at hot temperatures do better in sunny drought years. All butterflies are perfectly good butterflies, even if the abilities of some don't match the opportunities currently supplied by the environment.

I don't see any grounds for dignifying the diversity-repressing view for the benefit of sex as a viable alternative to the diversity-affirming view. To be agreeable, one might say both theories are valid. But this compromise isn't true. Conceding, even slightly, that one function of sex is to prune diversity puts forth a view that hasn't earned its place scientifically. Accepting a diversity-repressing view of sex simply to be polite admits through the back door a philosophical stance that may later be used to justify discrimination.

Therefore, I accept as a working premise that a species' biological rainbow is good-good because diversity allows a species to survive and prosper in continually changing conditions. I further accept that the purpose of sex is to maintain the rainbow's diversity, resynthesizing that diversity each generation in order to continually rebalance the genetic portfolio of the species. I reject the alternative theory that sex exists to prune the gene pool of bad diversity.
Darwinists have to take a consistent stand on the value of diversity. They can't maintain on the one hand that most variation is good because it's needed for natural selection and on the other hand also maintain that females must continually shop for males with the best genes as though most genes could be ranked from good to bad. Instead, I argue that almost all diversity is good and that female choice is more for the best match than for the best male.

How then should we assess the rainbows in our own species? We should be grateful that we do reproduce sexually, although we probably take this gift for granted. I feel too that we should conserve and embrace our rainbows. Affirming diversity is hard, very hard. We must come to accept ourselves and love our neighbors, regardless of color in the rainbow.
Overall, sex is essentially cooperative-a natural covenant to share genetic wealth. Sexual reproduction is not a battle.
-Roughgarden, Joan, Evolution's Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People, University of California Press Ltd: London, 2004

=================================
Personal Reflection Exercise Explanation

The Goal of this Home Study Course is to create a learning experience that enhances your clinical skills. We encourage you to discuss the Personal Reflection Journaling Activities, found at the end of each Section, with your colleagues. Thus, you are provided with an opportunity for a Group Discussion experience. Case Study examples might include: family background, socio-economic status, education, occupation, social/emotional issues, legal/financial issues, death/dying/health, home management, parenting, etc. as you deem appropriate. A Case Study is to be approximately 250 words in length. However, since the content of these “Personal Reflection” Journaling Exercises is intended for your future reference, they may contain confidential information and are to be applied as a “work in progress.” You will not be required to provide us with these Journaling Activities.
The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.

Personal Reflection Exercise #1
The preceding section contained information about the "Diversity-Repressing" theory. . Write three case study examples regarding how you might use the content of this section in your practice.

Online Continuing Education QUESTION 15
According to the diversity-repressing theory, what is the benefit of sex? Record the letter of the correct answer the CEU Answer Booklet.

 
Others who bought this LGBTQ Course
also bought…

Scroll DownScroll UpCourse Listing Bottom Cap


CEU Answer Booklet for this course | Homosexuality
Forward to Section 16 - Manual Article
Back to DVD Track 14
Table of Contents
Top

The article above contains foundational information. Articles below contain optional updates.
Out star of ‘Arrow’ bids farewell to fans after show kills off his character - May 25, 2017
John Barrowman is telling fans on Instagram he's "very sad and upset" his evil character was killed off-camera.
Will Donald Trump’s character defects imperil the world? - May 25, 2017
Trump and his administration have been continually undermining democratic values and human rights in his own country, so how will that play out worldwide?
This gay man’s hate letter sparked a play, a movie & a movement - May 25, 2017
When the fear of their love being discovered proved to be too much, Rodrigo Bellott's boyfriend took his life. That tragedy inspired him to help others.
Besty DeVos says state-funded schools can reject LGBTQ students - May 25, 2017
The Secretary of Education defended a federally-funded Indiana school's right to discriminate in the name of "school choice" and "flexibility."
Australian tennis star announces stupid boycott over support of marriage equality - May 25, 2017
She won't fly Qantas airlines now because the company supports marriage equality, but Australia's other major domestic airline, Virgin, does too.

CEU Continuing Education for
Counselor CEUs, Psychologist CEUs, Social Worker CEUs, MFT CEUs

OnlineCEUcredit.com Login


Forget your Password Reset it!