|Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979|
What about the custody arrangement?
" And I said Bullshit, I can provide just as much as you can. What makes you think that youre any better than I am? And what makes you think that youre a better parent than I am? I gave him this big struggle. Now its a month apiece. I must say that David calls me at least five times a day, at least, when hes at his fathers. And its very hard for me. I think, Im just waiting for the right time. His girlfriend is moving in. Shes in Washington in another PhD program. And I think once she moves in for good, shes not going to want to have those kids around.
This womans child, David, expressed his feelings through art. The message that this mother gets from her childs art is sorrow over a broken family. She said about one drawing: David says Im the one in red. Interesting, Im the only one without a smile, and note the position of the hand (reaching out to strike) on the gentleman with the tie! The evidence from this affluent family supports what every social worker and child health worker knows from clinical experience: that education, financial security, and social status are weak hedges against the damage that can be done to children if violence between the parents is observed and children are used as bartering points.
evidence is similar in a poorer family.
However, as the woman said: What do you mean he cares about the baby? He just about killed both of us. Finally after several weeks of legal negotiations, a visitation agreement was worked out for all the children. Each visit, however, was fraught with tension for mother as well as children. The mother complained that the father did not feed the children or change the infants diapers. The oldest child, age 5, said simply: He makes me cry. Also, in a most blatant display of using a child in parental battles, he said to the child:
Tell your mother I dont want her anymore ... I want her to die (although he continued to test every avenue through relatives and a pastor to persuade his wife to come back). Say to your mother, I dont love you. Tell your mother shes got money and I dont have any, to give me some. (This mother was being supported on Aid to Families with Dependent Children AFDC.)
This case suggests that the efforts of child advocates to influence divorce and custody decisions to assure the welfare of children are by no means sufficient. This fathers treatment of the children suggests that he might not have visited them at all if he had not entertained the hope of getting his wife back through this mechanism. While he did not openly express hostility about the mother to the children at the beginning of the separation, as his hope for her return dwindled, his visits became increasingly irregular and his barbs at the mother through the children more pointed and vicious.
The mother was explicitly advised by her lawyer and by the researcher when appropriate not to discuss negative things about the childrens father in their presence, nor to question them in a way that would leave the child in a conflicted position, except to ascertain discreetly if any physical abuse had occurred. This was another of those instances where I felt an ethical obligation to depart from the research role and intervene for the sake of the children.
After this mans divorce from his previous wife he never visited the three children of that marriage, although they were not far away. His former wife and the woman in this study met periodically in order to provide the half-siblings from these two marriages an opportunity to visit one another. The two women were also friendly and exchanged stories about the similar pattern of abuse in each of their marriages.
How do these examples
illustrate the childrens suffering?
Currently, this process is accomplished largely as an individual matter between her, her husband, and the respective lawyers whose tendency is to handle these cases in the general adversarial framework of law practice. Through contemporary rites of passage, this process would be extended to include other concerned members of the community. Thus the parents changed roles and responsibilities could be redefined and publicly supported to reduce the possibilities of parents and children alike becoming scapegoats for a problem that extends beyond the immediate family concerned.
But as one woman said after months of homelessness with two young children: Its the pits. Today Im number 11 on the emergency housing list. Here I am scrunched in one room, the babys clothes in a bag, no room for a crib, and theres rats here. Ive lost hope in the housing authority. The effect of such housing crises on children is bound to endure, though its full dimension may only be revealed in the next generation (Kozol 1988).
Because of the life-threatening nature of the crises it deals with, the battered womens movement has, of necessity, focused on refuges to protect women and children from immediate danger. As an unintended consequence, less attention has been given to what happens after resolution of the immediate crisis. Follow-up programs for women and children after they leave shelters are rare or their services quite limited.
This situation presents a sober reminder of how very new the battered womens movement is and of how much work remains to be done. It also underscores the irony of the fact that women and their children, the victims of violence, must struggle to re-stabilize their lives in home and school, while their assailants enjoy the comforts of the marital dwelling.
In fact, the womens fears and anticipation of the
struggles of single parenthood and establishing a new household are well-founded.
Their sharing of these struggles is not intended to suggest in the least that
they would prefer the horrors of living in a violent relationship. Still, the
price some women pay for freeing themselves of such violence is very high. The
experience of some battered women and their children for months after leaving
a violent mate presents poignant evidence of how little the womens movement
has touched the lives of many battered women. More importantly, the long-term
effects of violence on the children are yet to be revealed.
Reflection Exercise #2
Others who bought this Domestic Violence Course
Booklet for this course | Domestic Violence CEU Courses
Forward to Section 5
Back to Section 3
Table of Contents
North Carolina is among the top 10 states with the highest number of reported human trafficking cases, according to the National Human Trafficking Resource Center. Experts say the number of major interstates that cross through the state, the large agricultural population, and the stateâs strategic location along the East Coast contribute to the issue. Host Frank Stasio talks with legal experts, victim services advocates, and a law enforcement officer about human trafficking in the state. Victim-services advocates Karen Arias of Western North Carolina Human Trafficking Rapid Response Team and Mamie Adams, coordinator of Working to End Sex Trafficking in North Carolina, discuss the experiences and challenges faced by trafficking survivors in the state. Major Richard Hoffman of the Raleigh Police Department talks about the role of law enforcement in investigating and stopping human trafficking, and his work on trafficking cases. And Caitlin Ryland from Legal Aid of North Carolina talks
The year is coming to an end, and âThe State of Thingsâ staff is taking a moment to reflect on some of the yearâs most memorable conversations. Producer Anita Raoâs favorite segments include a conversation commemorating Yusor Abu-Salha, one of the three Muslim students shot and killed in Chapel Hill in February. Rao also chose a piece that explores body image, fat shaming, and the social history of womenâs bodies. She also picked a segment that shares the stories of three Latina women who work as house cleaners in Durham, and one that looks at how domestic violence impacted one coupleâs life and relationship. She ends the hour talking about a conversation with Avett Brothersâ Cellist Joe Kwon. Host Frank Stasio talks with Producer Anita Rao about her favorite conversations of the year.
This is a rebroadcast of a program that aired earlier this year. CJ Scarlet is an entrepreneur who believes that technology can curb violence. She founded the company 10 for Humanity that aims to use emerging technology to reduce acts of crime and violence by 10 percent in the next decade, starting with the Tiger Eye Sensor, a wearable personal security device that will record video footage and call the police when a wearer yells âhelp.â Scarletâs personal and professional experiences have informed the design and implementation of this sensor. She survived multiple assaults in her adolescence and early adulthood and has worked with victims of crime and assault for two decades, as a victims advocate and as the director of victimâs issues at the North Carolina Attorney Generalâs Office. She is full of unexpected stories, ranging from her experience as a firefighter to her day-to-day life as a photojournalist for the Marine Corps. Host Frank Stasio talks to CJ Scarlet about her life, work
A Family Justice Center is opening today in downtown Greensboro and will offer a variety of services. The new building will provide several types of support for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and elder abuse. Those services include law enforcement, legal, medical and social assistance. Center Director Catherine Johnson said it is a benefit that the building is a one-stop spot for people dealing with these issues. "The fact that we can offer (these services) makes the citizen much more likely to engage in that process, because they feel like, 'Oh hey, waitâinstead of me going to twenty different disciplines, those disciplines are all coming to me, and I just sit in the same office and respond,'" Johnson said. "It just makes that safety planning process much more effective." Guilford County had the stateâs highest number of domestic-violence-related deaths in 2013. North Carolina also has family justice centers in Alamance County and Henderson County.
Allison Leotta was a federal sex-crimes prosecutor in Washington D.C. for more than a decade. Every day when she came home from work, she would think to herself, âI canât believe what I saw todayâŚsomeone should write about this.â She began writing in the mornings before work and at night when she got home. In 2011, Leotta left the Justice Department to write full-time. She has now written four novels about a prosecutor named Anna Curtis, and people often refer to Leotta as âthe female John Grisham.â Host Frank Stasio talks to Allison Leotta about her latest novel âA Good Killingâ (Simon&Schuster 2015) and how she turns her real-life courtroom experience into fictional drama. Leotta reads from her book at Barnes & Noble in Cary tonight at 7 p.m. Leotta grew up with the legal system in her blood. Her father worked as a federal prosecutor in Detroit, and she followed in his footsteps after attending Harvard Law School. Her husband was also a federal prosecutor in Baltimore. Though