|Sponsored by the HealthcareTrainingInstitute.org providing Quality Education since 1979|
Battered mothers risk analyses for their children may include a range of concerns, such as physical violence, the childrens financial security, their emotional security, and their future well-being. Battered mothers may worry about the effects of growing up in a broken home or without a father in the home, or living in poverty. The stay/leave factor will also affect battered mothers analyses of their childrens risks.
Protecting children from being hit and from the effects of witnessing domestic violence is justified and compelling. Yet, like a battered mother, a childs risks are not limited to physical violence and its effects. The battered mothers risk analysis will provide information about both the childs risks and the mothers risks and decision-making. If the mothers decision-making is faulty and does not adequately address the childrens risks, the advocate may have to take action to protect the children. When significant risks for children are identified, enhanced advocacy is called for. Mothers leaving their relationship will not necessarily remove the risks for the children, and for some children, leaving may even increase their risks.
Although most battered women carefully and accurately analyze the risks to their children, some battered women do not; some womens analyses are incomplete or inaccurate; and some battered women are a threat to their children. Physical abuse of children is common in households where the mother is being beaten. For example, in Bowker et al.s (1988) study, the batterer abused both the mother and the children in 70% of the cases in which there were children in the household. The children were more likely to be abused when the battering was worse (it was more frequent, more severe, and more frequently included rape) and when there were larger numbers of children. Research still cannot tell us definitively which men who batter women are also most likely to abuse their children, however.
Studies have found that battered women sometimes abuse their children as well, although they do so at significantly lower rates than battering men do. For example, Stark and Flitcraft (1988) found that half of the batterers also abused the children, compared to 35% of the battered women. Straus (1983) reports that his first national survey found that batterers were twice as likely as battered women to abuse their children more than two times a year. Battered women were twice as likely as nonbattered women to abuse their children more than two times a year.
Although women often make decisions about safety and the future of their relationship based on their concerns about their children, systematic data on womens perceptions of their childrens risks have not been collected. Studies do suggest that as the abuse women experience becomes more frequent and severe, more of womens energy becomes focused on their own survival. Unfortunately, these are precisely the circumstances when children are more likely to be abused as well. This means that the worse the womans abuse, the more concerns and questions the advocates should have about any children in the household.
Review of risks to children is complex and requires a thorough understanding of the battered mothers risk analysis. In reviewing mothers analyses for their children, the advocate must distinguish among mothers who have little or no options and therefore have taken little action to address their childrens risks; mothers who have tried to take action but have not successfully reduced the risk; and mothers who have not tried to respond at all. The distinction will help determine when advocates must take action unilaterallywithout the mothers involvementto protect the children.
Unilateral action typically means making a report to state child protective services. When reports must be made to child protective services, advocates have urged that interventions be planned and coordinated so that women are not inaccurately blamed or their relationships with their children jeopardized, and that womens safety needs are considered as child protection service workers interview family members and plan services. As Peled (1996) notes, Child protective services should support and collaborate with the efforts of battered womens advocates to protect battered women and their children from further abuse. The perpetrator of violence must be held accountable not only for the abuse of his partner but also for the emotional abuse of the witnessing children.
The figure on the next page summarizes several types of battered mothers risk analyses and plans for their children and the suggested advocate responses, including when unilateral action is necessary.
Figure 1: Considerations for Action by Advocates to Respond to Children at Risk
Davies, Jill and Eleanor Lyon, Safety Planning With Battered Women, SAGE Publications:
Reflection Exercise #1
Others who bought this Domestic Violence Course
Booklet for this
course | Domestic Violence CEU Courses
Forward to Section 4
Back to Introduction
Table of Contents
North Carolina is among the top 10 states with the highest number of reported human trafficking cases, according to the National Human Trafficking Resource Center. Experts say the number of major interstates that cross through the state, the large agricultural population, and the stateâs strategic location along the East Coast contribute to the issue. Host Frank Stasio talks with legal experts, victim services advocates, and a law enforcement officer about human trafficking in the state. Victim-services advocates Karen Arias of Western North Carolina Human Trafficking Rapid Response Team and Mamie Adams, coordinator of Working to End Sex Trafficking in North Carolina, discuss the experiences and challenges faced by trafficking survivors in the state. Major Richard Hoffman of the Raleigh Police Department talks about the role of law enforcement in investigating and stopping human trafficking, and his work on trafficking cases. And Caitlin Ryland from Legal Aid of North Carolina talks
The year is coming to an end, and âThe State of Thingsâ staff is taking a moment to reflect on some of the yearâs most memorable conversations. Producer Anita Raoâs favorite segments include a conversation commemorating Yusor Abu-Salha, one of the three Muslim students shot and killed in Chapel Hill in February. Rao also chose a piece that explores body image, fat shaming, and the social history of womenâs bodies. She also picked a segment that shares the stories of three Latina women who work as house cleaners in Durham, and one that looks at how domestic violence impacted one coupleâs life and relationship. She ends the hour talking about a conversation with Avett Brothersâ Cellist Joe Kwon. Host Frank Stasio talks with Producer Anita Rao about her favorite conversations of the year.
This is a rebroadcast of a program that aired earlier this year. CJ Scarlet is an entrepreneur who believes that technology can curb violence. She founded the company 10 for Humanity that aims to use emerging technology to reduce acts of crime and violence by 10 percent in the next decade, starting with the Tiger Eye Sensor, a wearable personal security device that will record video footage and call the police when a wearer yells âhelp.â Scarletâs personal and professional experiences have informed the design and implementation of this sensor. She survived multiple assaults in her adolescence and early adulthood and has worked with victims of crime and assault for two decades, as a victims advocate and as the director of victimâs issues at the North Carolina Attorney Generalâs Office. She is full of unexpected stories, ranging from her experience as a firefighter to her day-to-day life as a photojournalist for the Marine Corps. Host Frank Stasio talks to CJ Scarlet about her life, work
A Family Justice Center is opening today in downtown Greensboro and will offer a variety of services. The new building will provide several types of support for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and elder abuse. Those services include law enforcement, legal, medical and social assistance. Center Director Catherine Johnson said it is a benefit that the building is a one-stop spot for people dealing with these issues. "The fact that we can offer (these services) makes the citizen much more likely to engage in that process, because they feel like, 'Oh hey, waitâinstead of me going to twenty different disciplines, those disciplines are all coming to me, and I just sit in the same office and respond,'" Johnson said. "It just makes that safety planning process much more effective." Guilford County had the stateâs highest number of domestic-violence-related deaths in 2013. North Carolina also has family justice centers in Alamance County and Henderson County.
Allison Leotta was a federal sex-crimes prosecutor in Washington D.C. for more than a decade. Every day when she came home from work, she would think to herself, âI canât believe what I saw todayâŚsomeone should write about this.â She began writing in the mornings before work and at night when she got home. In 2011, Leotta left the Justice Department to write full-time. She has now written four novels about a prosecutor named Anna Curtis, and people often refer to Leotta as âthe female John Grisham.â Host Frank Stasio talks to Allison Leotta about her latest novel âA Good Killingâ (Simon&Schuster 2015) and how she turns her real-life courtroom experience into fictional drama. Leotta reads from her book at Barnes & Noble in Cary tonight at 7 p.m. Leotta grew up with the legal system in her blood. Her father worked as a federal prosecutor in Detroit, and she followed in his footsteps after attending Harvard Law School. Her husband was also a federal prosecutor in Baltimore. Though